Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Comparative Analysis of Polynomial-fit-SMOTE Variations with Tree-Based Classifiers on Software Defect Prediction Nur Hidayatullah, Wildan; Herteno, Rudy; Reza Faisal, Mohammad; Adi Nugroho, Radityo; Wahyu Saputro, Setyo; Akhtar, Zarif Bin
Journal of Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics Vol 6 No 3 (2024): July
Publisher : Department of Electromedical Engineering, POLTEKKES KEMENKES SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35882/jeeemi.v6i3.455

Abstract

Software defects present a significant challenge to the reliability of software systems, often resulting in substantial economic losses. This study examines the efficacy of polynomial-fit SMOTE (pf-SMOTE) variants in combination with tree-based classifiers for software defect prediction, utilising the NASA Metrics Data Program (MDP) dataset. The research methodology involves partitioning the dataset into training and test subsets, applying pf-SMOTE oversampling, and evaluating classification performance using Decision Trees, Random Forests, and Extra Trees. Findings indicate that the combination of pf-SMOTE-star oversampling with Extra Tree classification achieves the highest average accuracy (90.91%) and AUC (95.67%) across 12 NASA MDP datasets. This demonstrates the potential of pf-SMOTE variants to enhance classification effectiveness. However, it is important to note that caution is warranted regarding potential biases introduced by synthetic data. These findings represent a significant advancement over previous research endeavors, underscoring the critical role of meticulous algorithm selection and dataset characteristics in optimizing classification outcomes. Noteworthy implications include advancements in software reliability and decision support for software project management. Future research may delve into synergies between pf-SMOTE variants and alternative classification methods, as well as explore the integration of hyperparameter tuning to further refine classification performance.
Evaluation of User Experience in the Banjarbaru Disdukcapil Public Service Application Using User Experience Questionnaire and System Usability Scale Martalisa, Asri; Wahyu Saputro, Setyo; Turianto Nugrahadi, Dodon; Abadi, Friska; Budiman, Irwan
Scientific Journal of Informatics Vol. 11 No. 4: November 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/sji.v11i4.13780

Abstract

Purpose: Dukcapil Banjarbaru is an online-based government agency application used for various public services. According to the complaint report from Disdukcapil Banjarbaru, several users have reported similar problems and difficulties. The application has received a rating of 3.3 stars from approximately 24.000 users on the Google Play Store. Therefore, researchers conducted a user experience analysis using the UEQ methods and a usability evaluation using the SUS methods. Methods: This research analyzes user experience in applications using the UEQ to identify issues faced by users and evaluate usability through the System Usability Scale. The UEQ method is chosen for its efficiency and simplicity in assessing user experience within an application. The SUS method is employed because it is an effective approach for obtaining reliable statistical data and generating clear and accurate scores. Result: The UEQ benchmark results show that the scales for Attractiveness (1.59), Efficiency (1.68), Accuracy (1.66), and Stimulation (1.54) are categorized as "Good." The scales for clarity (1.37) and novelty (0.80) are classified as "Above Average." Meanwhile, the SUS score of 65 positions the application within the "acceptable" category for the acceptability range, the "D" category on the grade scale, and the "OK" category for adjective ratings. This indicates that while the Banjarbaru Dukcapil application has good usability, it requires improvements based on the total SUS score, which reveals several critical areas with scores below the average (258.4). Novelty: In this research, solutions for improvements are provided to Disdukcapil based on each aspect to improve the quality of the application, thereby offering better services to users.