Fathana, Hangga
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Me Too as Transnational Advocacy Networks: The Case of Anti-Sexual Violence Movement in Indonesia Dewi, Karina Utami; Fathana, Hangga; Rohma, Masitoh Nur
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v11i2.8858

Abstract

The research discusses the anti-sexual movement in Indonesia as a part of the global movement of Me Too and transnational advocacy networks. It aims to answer how the transnational advocacy movement explains the movement against sexual violence in Indonesia. The argument of the research is offered in three parts. First, it argues that the anti-sexual violence movement in Indonesia is a part of transnational advocacy networks. The analysis is provided by explaining the process of boomerang patterns, political entrepreneurs, and international contacts. Second, as part of a transnational advocacy network, the anti-sexual violence movement in Indonesia uses four tactics: information politics, symbolic politics, leverage politics, and accountability politics. The research argues that the anti-sexual violence movement uses all four of the tactics to achieve its goals. Lastly, the third part of the argument discusses the five stages of transnational advocacy networks that the movement has achieved with regard to their goals, and the research argues that it has reached all the stages except for the last one, which is influenced by state behavior.
Australia–Indonesia Economic Relations Under IA-CEPA: Between Proximity and Distance Fathana, Hangga; Mulia, Jalaluddin Rizqi
MUKADIMAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sejarah, dan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol 9, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Prodi Pendidikan Sejarah Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Islam Sumatera

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/mkd.v9i2.12016

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which the Indonesia–Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IA-CEPA) has contributed to strengthening bilateral relations. It argues that despite geographic proximity, trade ties remain weak and IA-CEPA alone is unlikely to generate long-term mutual benefits. Employing an interpretivist qualitative interpretivist approach, the study draws on government reports and policy documents to analyze negotiation dynamics and outcomes. The article introduces an actor-centered perspective, showing how limited civil society involvement has constrained the agreement’s potential. It argues that IA-CEPA is unlikely to provide long-term mutual benefits unless the government of the two countries provides a more comprehensive approach to public diplomacy. The findings suggest that without stronger political leadership and more inclusive public diplomacy, IA-CEPA will deliver suboptimal results. The study highlights the need for people-to-people engagement as a bridge-builder for sustainable cooperation.