Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Administrasi Publik dan Kebijakan Negara
Sarmadani Sarmadani
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbedaan Undang – Undang Ketenagakerjaan Dan RUU Omnibuslaw Cipta Kerja Sarmadani Sarmadani; Brian Daniel Raja Gukguk; Fahrozi Fahrozi
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol 2 No 1 (2024): Maret : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/perkara.v2i1.1622

Abstract

In an effort to support investment growth, the Omnibus Law simplifies the licensing process and provides fiscal incentives. However, criticism emerged mainly from environmental groups who expressed concern over the potential reduction in environmental protection as a consequence of these changes. When the Omnibus Law on Job Creation was passed, mass protests and demonstrations emerged in various cities in Indonesia. Labor unions and activist groups opposed the changes in the law, demanding the maintenance of workers' rights and environmental sustainability. This discontent reflects the divisions among the public regarding the impact of the Omnibus Law on daily life and the future of the country. The government needs to communicate with various stakeholders, including labor unions, employers, and environmental groups, to strike a fair balance and ensure that policies reflect the common interest. The purpose of this paper is to find out the differences between the Manpower Law and the Job Creation Law. The author will use normative legal research conducted by examining secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary materials. This research is also called library research or document study, because it is mostly done on secondary data in the library. The conclusion of this paper is that the labor cluster of the Job Creation Law (omnibuslaw) is a legal product that relieves employers and is binding on workers. That the comparison of the Manpower Law with the Job Creation Law is a legal product that is made into one big economic and investment issue, in this case the Job Creation Law's labor cluster actually ignores the philosophy of the Manpower Law it replaces.
Perbedaan Undang – Undang Ketenagakerjaan Dan RUU Omnibuslaw Cipta Kerja Sarmadani Sarmadani; Brian Daniel Raja Gukguk; Fahrozi Fahrozi
Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Perkara Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/perkara.v2i1.1622

Abstract

In an effort to support investment growth, the Omnibus Law simplifies the licensing process and provides fiscal incentives. However, criticism emerged mainly from environmental groups who expressed concern over the potential reduction in environmental protection as a consequence of these changes. When the Omnibus Law on Job Creation was passed, mass protests and demonstrations emerged in various cities in Indonesia. Labor unions and activist groups opposed the changes in the law, demanding the maintenance of workers' rights and environmental sustainability. This discontent reflects the divisions among the public regarding the impact of the Omnibus Law on daily life and the future of the country. The government needs to communicate with various stakeholders, including labor unions, employers, and environmental groups, to strike a fair balance and ensure that policies reflect the common interest. The purpose of this paper is to find out the differences between the Manpower Law and the Job Creation Law. The author will use normative legal research conducted by examining secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary materials. This research is also called library research or document study, because it is mostly done on secondary data in the library. The conclusion of this paper is that the labor cluster of the Job Creation Law (omnibuslaw) is a legal product that relieves employers and is binding on workers. That the comparison of the Manpower Law with the Job Creation Law is a legal product that is made into one big economic and investment issue, in this case the Job Creation Law's labor cluster actually ignores the philosophy of the Manpower Law it replaces.
Collaborative Governance pada Pemberantasan Peredaran Narkotika di Kota Tanjungpinang Sarmadani Sarmadani; Yudhanto Satyagraha Adiputra; Khairi Rahmi
Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Administrasi Publik dan Kebijakan Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juli : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Administrasi Publik dan Kebijakan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/komunikasi.v2i3.563

Abstract

The circulation of narcotics in Tanjungpinang City has increased from 2019 to 2023, despite various programs implemented by relevant agencies. Based on the data, there were 422 suspects apprehended, with 395 suspects acting as distributors (dealers) and 27 suspects as users. The presence of two main institutions, the National Narcotics Agency of Tanjungpinang City and the Narcotics Crime Unit of Tanjungpinang City Police, has not yet been fully effective in reducing the rate of drug trafficking. This study aims to analyze the application of collaborative governance in combating drug trafficking in Tanjungpinang City, based on the theory of Schottle, Haghsheno, and Gehbauer (2014) with seven indicators: willingness to compromise, communication, commitment, mutual trust, transparency/information exchange, knowledge sharing, and willingness to take risks. The method used is a descriptive qualitative approach. Data was collected through interviews and documentation. The research results indicate that willingness to compromise is reflected in cooperation such as joint investigations and coordination in handling suspects. Communication between agencies is conducted both formally and digitally, though not yet structured on a routine basis, it remains responsive. Commitment is demonstrated through Operation Antik, the BNNP prevention program, and the consistent and sustained participation of the DPC GANN. Mutual trust is built through open communication and recognition of each party's role. Transparency and information exchange are evident in the openness of data and access to information between agencies and the public, though technological challenges remain. Knowledge sharing is facilitated through contributions from the National Narcotics Agency (BNN), the police, and former offenders, fostering collective learning. Willingness to take risks is evident in the courage to adopt new approaches for innovation in drug eradication.
Co-Authors Brian Daniel Raja Gukguk Fahrozi Fahrozi Khairi Rahmi Yudhanto Satyagraha Adiputra