Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

REVIEW OF THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF DIVORCE ON CHILD CUSTODY ARRANGEMENTS Mau, Ellon Belwan Cornelius; Rafael, Tontji Christian
Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL POROS HUKUM PADJADJARAN
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jphp.v5i2.1639

Abstract

Divorce not only entails property division but also raises significant concerns regarding child custody. Courts often intervene to determine which parent is better suited to care for the child after divorce. This research aims to explore the legal implications of divorce on child custody rights and understand the factors influencing custody decisions between fathers and mothers, both individually and jointly. Employing descriptive analysis with a normative approach, the study utilizes secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. Findings suggest that divorce can result in the loss of child custody rights due to neglect of parental obligations and immoral behavior, which may have contributed to the divorce. Additionally, judges consider various factors in determining custody, including the child's welfare, emotional connection with parents, and parental responsibilities. Factors such as parental presence in the child's life, financial support, and emotional interactions with the child influence custody decisions. Therefore, it is recommended that parents maintain positive relationships with their children, prioritize family unity, and actively fulfill their duties in providing protection, affection, and proper education.
ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DI LUAR PASAL DAKWAAN PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA Rafael, Tontji Christian
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v3i2.187

Abstract

This research aims to find out and analyze what the judge considers in making a criminal decision outside the articles of the public prosecutor's indictment for narcotics crimes? This research uses normative or doctrinal legal research methods which focus on the law approach, concept approach and case approach. In the research, it was found that the judge's consideration in handing down a decision beyond the public prosecutor's indictment in a narcotics crime was that the public prosecutor in determining the articles of indictment was based only on the conditions when the defendant was arrested. The public prosecutor did not consider the purpose and amount of the purchase of narcotics by the defendant before establishing the indictment. Applicability of Jurisprudence Number: 1671 K/pid/1996 which rendered a decision outside the indictment of the public prosecutor. The advice given by the author is that it is hoped that judges in deciding cases will always maintain the independence of the judiciary which has been mandated by the constitution and law and always be based on the law and everything proven in the trial by being active in finding the law and creating decisions that reflect legal values, namely justice, certainty and legal benefits for every justice seeker.
Penyuluhan Hukum: Hidup Bersama sebagai Suami Istri Diluar Perkawinan yang Sah Menurut Perspektif Hukum Pidana Ekon, Yanto M.P.; Rafael, Tontji Christian; Pattiruhu, Fransina; Ndaomanu, Frengky
Joong-Ki : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 1: November 2025
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/joongki.v5i1.12846

Abstract

Perkawinan dinyatakan sah apabila memenuhi ketentuan Pasal 1 dan Pasal 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974, yang secara kumulatif mensyaratkan aspek agama dan yuridis. Namun dalam praktik sosial masih ditemukan fenomena hidup bersama menyerupai suami-istri tanpa perkawinan yang sah (kohabitasi), yang dipandang negatif karena identik dengan hubungan seksual di luar ikatan perkawinan. Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat ini bertujuan memberikan pemahaman dan meningkatkan kesadaran hukum Jemaat GMIT Baithania Tulun Klasis Kupang Tengah mengenai pengaturan sanksi pidana terhadap kohabitasi sebagaimana diatur dalam KUHP Nasional, serta menjelaskan proses hukum atas perkawinan yang tidak memenuhi syarat sahnya perkawinan. Metode yang digunakan adalah penyuluhan hukum melalui paparan materi dan diskusi interaktif, dengan total peserta sebanyak 70 orang jemaat. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan peningkatan pemahaman dan kesadaran hukum peserta terkait larangan dan konsekuensi pidana terhadap kohabitasi, dengan capaian pemahaman berada pada rentang 80–100%. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa penyuluhan hukum berbasis komunitas efektif dalam meningkatkan literasi hukum masyarakat terkait sah/tidak sahnya perkawinan dan implikasi pidananya.
Legal and Geopolitical Dynamics in the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf Boundaries among Indonesia, Australia, and Timor-Leste in the Timor Sea Ekon, Yanto M.P.; Kase, Alfred G.O; Ndaomanu, Melkianus; Rafael, Tontji Christian
Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Sipakatau
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/sipakatau.v3i3.713

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal inconsistency in the delimitation of continental shelf boundaries in the Timor Sea involving Indonesia, Australia, and Timor-Leste. It focuses on the contrast between the Indonesia–Australia Continental Shelf Agreement of 1972, which applies a special circumstances approach based on geological features, and the Australia–Timor-Leste Maritime Boundary Treaty of 2018, which adopts the median line principle in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982. This research employs a normative legal method, examining international treaties, legal doctrines, and relevant judicial decisions. The findings indicate that the difference in delimitation methods results from both the absence of trilateral negotiations and the evolution of international maritime law. The application of geological considerations in the 1972 agreement has led to a delimitation outcome that significantly disadvantages Indonesia, while the 2018 treaty reflects a more equitable and modern legal approach. This inconsistency creates legal uncertainty and raises concerns regarding fairness in the allocation of continental shelf areas. The study further demonstrates that Indonesia has strong legal grounds to seek renegotiation or adjustment of the 1972 agreement, particularly in light of the principles of equity and distance-based criteria under UNCLOS 1982. A consistent application of these principles is essential to ensure fairness and legal certainty in maritime boundary delimitation.