Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Integrating Planned Behavior and Technology Acceptance Models: A Study of GoFood after COVID-19 Margaret, Felicia; Sidharta, Helena
Journal The Winners Vol. 24 No. 2 (2023): Journal The Winners
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/tw.v24i2.10847

Abstract

One of the most apparent changes due to COVID-19 pandemic was the increase in the utilization of online food delivery services. An in-depth analysis was needed to find the fundamental aspects behind this change that make online food delivery services an integral part of people’s lifestyles even after the pandemic. The research aimed to explore the determinants of customers’ intention to use GoFood (IU) by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to construct the research model. The research novelty was reflected through convenience motivation, which was crucial in enhancing the intention to use GoFood. This was achieved by exploring the interaction between the TAM and TPB. The underlying factors behind customers’ intention to use GoFood were defined by price-saving orientation (PSO) and timesaving orientation (TSO) with a mediating variable called convenience motivation (CM). Afterward, 252 valid questionnaires from respondents who live in Surabaya and Sidoarjo were collected using thesnowball sampling method and analyzed using the SEM-PLS method. The result reveals that PSO is the most significant factor behind the intention to use (IU). Meanwhile, TSO only indirectly affects IU, which means it will only be impactful when mediated by CM. Moreover, CM itself has a significant impact on IU.
The Truth Behind the Label: Ensuring Fairness and Legal Liabilities in Skincare Ingredient Overclaims Margaret, Felicia; Sapni, Dripsy Teresa P.; Kongres, Evi
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v18i2.132375

Abstract

Recently, interest in skincare products has grown dramatically. As a result, there is intense competition due to the emergence of numerous new skincare brands. Some skincare brands, in their pursuit of greater profits, resort to unethical practices, such as overclaiming the ingredients on the packaging. These exaggerated claims not only deceive consumers but also result in a significant discrepancy between the promised and actual ingredient composition which lead to potential harm to consumers' health and financial losses. This research's legal concern is corporate actors' liability for making exaggerated claims about the ingredients’ composition that harms consumers’ rights. This research offers a novel perspective to the legal protection for consumers by focusing specifically on ingredients overclaims in skincare products that do not match reality. The analysis is based on articles on consumer rights in Law No. 8/1999 using the normative legal method. Through this research, it was found that the legal responsibility of business actors is often hindered by gaps in law enforcement processes. These challenges, such as inadequate regulation enforcement and lack of transparency, must be addressed to mitigate the widespread phenomenon of ingredient overclaims in the skincare industry. In conclusion, effective legal safeguards and more stringent monitoring mechanisms are essential to uphold consumer rights and ensure fair business practices within the skincare sector.
Legal Liability for the Bankruptcy of a Limited Liability Company Resulting from Unlawful Conduct Laksana, Angelia; Margaret, Felicia; Pradigdo, Yolanda Yuliani; Wuwung, Ivana Cindi Lydia
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2471

Abstract

Abstract: This study explores the legal liability of a limited liability company in the event of bankruptcy arising from unlawful acts committed by its management or controlling parties. The research aims to analyse the extent to which corporate liability can be imposed under Indonesian company law, bankruptcy law, and civil law principles, particularly when the principle of limited liability is challenged by fraudulent or unlawful conduct. Using a normative juridical method, this study examines primary legal sources, including the Indonesian Civil Code, Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, and Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. Secondary legal materials, such as books, journal articles, and legal commentaries, are also analysed to provide theoretical support and comparative perspectives. The findings suggest that although the doctrine of separate legal personality protects shareholders from personal liability, exceptions may apply when unlawful acts such as fraud, bad faith, or abuse of corporate structure occur, thereby justifying the piercing of the corporate veil. This study highlights the importance of balancing legal certainty with fairness and accountability in corporate bankruptcy cases which offers recommendations that strengthen creditor protection and ensure directors cannot evade responsibility through corporate formalities. Keyword: limited liability company, bankruptcy, legal liability, unlawful conduct