Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Talitha, Raisyha
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Studi Kasus Perilaku Psikopat Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan dari Perspektif Kriminologi Raharjo, Angga Sandhika; Asmara, Daffi Allegra; Delzanty, Kayla; Talitha, Raisyha; Rosdiana, Hani; Ramadhani, Sherlyta; Setiady, Achmad Hanif Avicenna; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11387193

Abstract

Crime is a complex phenomenon that can be understood from various points of view. In the context of criminology, crime refers to human actions that violate the basic norms that apply in society. In this research, the author conducted a review of previous research. This research uses a normative juridical research method by examining statutory regulations sourced from the Criminal Code, namely the Law that regulates murder as stated in CHAPTER XIX Crimes against Life, namely Articles 338-350 of the Criminal Code. This research emphasizes the criminological implications of the crime of murder committed by psychopaths and the legal resolution.Angga Sandhika Raharjo[1], Daffi Allegra Asmara2, Kayla Delzanty3, Raisyha Talitha4, Hani Rosdiana5, Sherlyta Ramadhani6, Achmad Hanif Avicenna Setiady7, Mulyadi8*[1]Email penulis: 2210611063@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id1,  2210611073@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id2 2210611172@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id3 , 2210611178@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id4 . 2210611195mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id5, 2210611199@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id62210611329@mahasiswa.upnvj.ac.id7
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pengrusakan Barang Milik Orang Lain Tanpa Disengaja Menurut Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Delzanty, Kayla; Talitha, Raisyha; Hakim, Mohammad Akmal Taris; Rosdiana, Hani; Ramadhani, Sherlyta; Yuli, Yuliana
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11378612

Abstract

Damaging other people's property is behavior that invites concern and worry in society. This action not only harms individual rights and interests, but also has broad social impacts. The material losses that arise can have an impact on the economic stability of a person or even a community. Apart from that, there are psychological aspects that also have an influence, such as feelings of insecurity and loss of trust in the surrounding environment. Therefore, legal regulations in both the criminal and civil realms have formulated strict provisions regarding this matter. In the realm of criminal law, destroying property can be considered a criminal act that can be subject to sanctions in the form of imprisonment or a fine, depending on the severity of the act and the value of the loss caused. Meanwhile, in the realm of civil law, damage to goods can be a basis for the owner of the goods to demand compensation for the losses suffered. The debate around how to confront and deal with damage to other people's property from a criminal and civil law perspective is becoming increasingly important in the context of justice and the protection of society.
Pelanggaran Etika Profesi serta Konsekuensi Tanggung Jawab Hukum dalam Kasus Suap Jaksa Farizal Purnama, Rendika; Delzanty, Kayla; Talitha, Raisyha; Hakim, Mohammad Akmal Taris; Rosdiana, Hani; Ramadhani, Sherlyta; Permana, Fatur Rezqy; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15581816

Abstract

The bribery case involving Prosecutor Farizal represents the damaging impact of violations of professional ethics on the legitimacy of judicial institutions. The act is not only a violation of fundamental principles such as integrity and impartiality that should be upheld by every prosecutor, but also tarnishes the main values in Tri Krama Adhyaksa which are the moral foundation of the Indonesian Attorney General's Office. Farizal's involvement in corrupt practices also adds to the long list of cases of irregularities committed by law enforcement officers, thus deepening the crisis of public trust in the judicial mechanism in Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal method that relies on various written legal sources to answer the problems that have been formulated. The approach used in this study consists of a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach. Through the statutory regulatory approach, researchers examine relevant legal norms, especially those regulating the ethics of the prosecutor's profession and the form of legal accountability for violations committed by law enforcement officers. The results of the study show that the violation of professional ethics committed by Prosecutor Farizal in this bribery case reflects serious deviations that not only damage the integrity of the prosecutor's office, but also reduce public trust in the justice system. His actions, which involved accepting bribes to influence the legal process, are contrary to the basic principles of the Prosecutor's Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct, such as integrity, impartiality, and accountability.
Analisis Yuridis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Dugaan Unsur Penyesatan Dalam Perjanjian Kawin Delzanty, Kayla; Talitha, Raisyha; Rosdiana, Hani; Ramadhani, Sherlyta; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15568560

Abstract

A prenuptial agreement serves as a legal instrument that enables spouses to regulate their rights and obligations throughout the course of marriage. However, in practice, such agreements are not immune to legal deviations, particularly regarding the element of misrepresentation which may constitute an unlawful act (onrechtmatige daad). This study aims to provide a juridical analysis of potential misrepresentation in prenuptial agreements and the legal remedies available under Indonesian law. Utilizing a normative legal approach and a case study of Decision Number 526/PDT/G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel, the research reveals that agreements formed dishonestly and without mutual understanding between the parties may be deemed invalid and annulled by the court. Misrepresentation in this context is considered a defect of consent that violates the principles of honesty and equality in civil contracts. The court's decision highlights that Indonesian law, through civil litigation mechanisms, is capable of offering effective legal protection to aggrieved parties. Consequently, stronger regulation and oversight in the drafting of prenuptial agreements are necessary to ensure the realization of justice and legal certainty.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Notaris Dalam Sengketa Wanprestasi Perjanjian Hutang Piutang Delzanty, Kayla; Talitha, Raisyha; Rosdiana, Hani; Ramadhani, Sherlyta
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15567605

Abstract

This article analyzes the role and evidentiary strength of notarial deeds in default (wanprestasi) cases related to loan agreements, based on the Decision of the Jember District Court Number 58/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Jmr. As an authentic deed under Article 1868 of the Indonesian Civil Code, a notarial deed has perfect evidentiary power unless proven otherwise. In this case, the panel of judges relied on a notarized loan agreement and debt acknowledgment letter as the primary basis for concluding that the defendant had committed default. The defendant's absence and lack of counter-evidence further strengthened the position of the notarial deed as valid and sufficient sole proof. This study affirms that although the strength of a notarial deed is not absolute, it significantly influences the direction and outcome of civil court decisions. The analysis also highlights the importance of notarial professionalism and the need for contracting parties to understand the legal implications of their agreements.
Co-Authors Asmara, Daffi Allegra Delzanty, Kayla Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Hakim, Mohammad Akmal Taris Mulyadi M, Mulyadi Permana, Fatur Rezqy Purnama, Rendika Raharjo, Angga Sandhika Ramadhani, Sherlyta Rosdiana, Hani Setiady, Achmad Hanif Avicenna Yuli, Yuliana