Hakim, Mohammad Akmal Taris
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pengrusakan Barang Milik Orang Lain Tanpa Disengaja Menurut Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Delzanty, Kayla; Talitha, Raisyha; Hakim, Mohammad Akmal Taris; Rosdiana, Hani; Ramadhani, Sherlyta; Yuli, Yuliana
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11378612

Abstract

Damaging other people's property is behavior that invites concern and worry in society. This action not only harms individual rights and interests, but also has broad social impacts. The material losses that arise can have an impact on the economic stability of a person or even a community. Apart from that, there are psychological aspects that also have an influence, such as feelings of insecurity and loss of trust in the surrounding environment. Therefore, legal regulations in both the criminal and civil realms have formulated strict provisions regarding this matter. In the realm of criminal law, destroying property can be considered a criminal act that can be subject to sanctions in the form of imprisonment or a fine, depending on the severity of the act and the value of the loss caused. Meanwhile, in the realm of civil law, damage to goods can be a basis for the owner of the goods to demand compensation for the losses suffered. The debate around how to confront and deal with damage to other people's property from a criminal and civil law perspective is becoming increasingly important in the context of justice and the protection of society.
Pelanggaran Etika Profesi serta Konsekuensi Tanggung Jawab Hukum dalam Kasus Suap Jaksa Farizal Purnama, Rendika; Delzanty, Kayla; Talitha, Raisyha; Hakim, Mohammad Akmal Taris; Rosdiana, Hani; Ramadhani, Sherlyta; Permana, Fatur Rezqy; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15581816

Abstract

The bribery case involving Prosecutor Farizal represents the damaging impact of violations of professional ethics on the legitimacy of judicial institutions. The act is not only a violation of fundamental principles such as integrity and impartiality that should be upheld by every prosecutor, but also tarnishes the main values in Tri Krama Adhyaksa which are the moral foundation of the Indonesian Attorney General's Office. Farizal's involvement in corrupt practices also adds to the long list of cases of irregularities committed by law enforcement officers, thus deepening the crisis of public trust in the judicial mechanism in Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal method that relies on various written legal sources to answer the problems that have been formulated. The approach used in this study consists of a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach. Through the statutory regulatory approach, researchers examine relevant legal norms, especially those regulating the ethics of the prosecutor's profession and the form of legal accountability for violations committed by law enforcement officers. The results of the study show that the violation of professional ethics committed by Prosecutor Farizal in this bribery case reflects serious deviations that not only damage the integrity of the prosecutor's office, but also reduce public trust in the justice system. His actions, which involved accepting bribes to influence the legal process, are contrary to the basic principles of the Prosecutor's Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct, such as integrity, impartiality, and accountability.