Julian Amriwijaya
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE COMPLIANCE WITH TRAFFIC RULES AMONG ADOLESCENT MOTORCYCLISTS Julian Amriwijaya; Sunggoro Trirahardjo
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS Vol. 3 No. 9 (2026): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS (INJOSER)
Publisher : Adisam Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Psychological factors play an important role in traffic compliance. Some psychological aspects that can influence driver behavior include self-safety motivation, self-control, and legal awareness. In psychology, the problem of compliance with the law alone is indeed less effective in implementing the law in society. Returning to the definition above, compliance is limited to only not violating the rules or avoiding punishment, so the attitude of compliance is only temporary. It would be ideal if traffic regulations were not only obeyed but also not internalized. If people have internalized the rules, they will obey them very much at all times. Because if they violate what has been internalized, then conflict will arise within themselves, in general people try to avoid conflicts. The relationship between psychological factors and compliance with traffic regulations is very complex and is influenced by various elements, including individual motivation, self-control, and legal awareness. Efforts to improve compliance must consider these aspects to create a safer traffic environment. Adolescent compliance with traffic regulations, especially for motorcyclists, is influenced by various psychological factors. Overall, these psychological factors interact with each other and influence adolescent behavior in traffic. Efforts to improve compliance with traffic regulations must consider these psychological aspects to be more effective.
Berpikir Cepat atau Berpikir Tepat?: Pengaruh Tekanan Waktu terhadap Akurasi Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Konteks Akademik Sumardi, Margaret Averina; Rava Gladisa; Nafisah Salsabila; Amanda Regina Arif; Julian Amriwijaya; Michael Titan Bagas Wicaksana
Mediapsi Vol 12 No 1 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.mps.2026.012.01.1249

Abstract

Time pressure in academic evaluation contexts may compromise the quality of students' cognitive processing, yet its effect on decision-making accuracy among secondary school students remains underexplored. This study examined the effect of time pressure on decision-making accuracy in 75 eleventh-grade students at SMA X Jatinangor using a between-subjects posttest-only control group design. Accuracy was operationalized as the number of correct responses on the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT-8C), a measure of the ability to override intuitive but incorrect responses in favour of analytical reasoning. Results from a Mann-Whitney U test indicated that students in the time-pressured experimental group scored significantly lower than the control group (z = −2.36, p = .009, r = .27). These findings are consistent with Speed-Accuracy Trade-off Theory and Dual-Processing Theory, suggesting that time constraints shift cognitive processing toward System 1 thinking at the expense of reflective analysis. Practically, these results highlight the need for more deliberate time allocation in academic assessments to better reflect students' actual reasoning capacity. Tekanan waktu dalam konteks evaluasi akademik berpotensi mengganggu kualitas pemrosesan kognitif siswa, namun pengaruhnya terhadap akurasi pengambilan keputusan pada pelajar sekolah menengah masih belum banyak dikaji. Penelitian ini mengkaji pengaruh tekanan waktu terhadap akurasi pengambilan keputusan pada 75 pelajar kelas XI SMA X Jatinangor menggunakan desain eksperimental between-subjects posttest-only control group. Akurasi dioperasionalisasikan sebagai jumlah jawaban benar pada Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT-8C), yaitu instrumen yang mengukur kemampuan individu untuk mengesampingkan respons intuitif yang keliru demi pengambilan keputusan yang analitis. Hasil uji Mann-Whitney U menunjukkan bahwa kelompok eksperimen yang diberi tekanan waktu memperoleh skor akurasi yang secara signifikan lebih rendah dibandingkan kelompok kontrol (z = −2.36, p = .009, r = .27). Temuan ini konsisten dengan Speed-Accuracy Trade-off Theory dan Dual-Processing Theory, yang menjelaskan bahwa tekanan waktu menggeser pemrosesan kognitif ke arah berpikir Sistem 1 sehingga menghambat analisis reflektif. Secara praktis, hasil ini menegaskan perlunya pertimbangan alokasi waktu yang lebih cermat dalam evaluasi akademik agar dapat lebih mencerminkan kapasitas penalaran siswa yang sesungguhnya.