Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Tenaga Kerja Penyandang Disabilitas Fisik dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketenagakerjaan dan UU No.8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas Purwinarto, Dona Putri; Faizah, Syarifah; Amanda, Cindy Pricillia; Aminah, Siti; Hafsah, Riana Yuni; Rumapea, Erika Hotmauly; Septiani, Sofi Aldini; Ramadanti, Cantika; Wijaya, Mustika Mega
AHKAM Vol 2 No 2 (2023): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v2i2.1121

Abstract

People with disabilities also have the same rights as citizens. In fact, there is still a lot of discrimination of the rights of persons with disabilities in working and looking for work. The usefulness of this research is as a reference for development efforts in the field of law, especially in the field of labor regarding the application of legal protection for persons with disabilities. The purpose of this research is to provide knowledge to readers in understanding the importance of the role of society, government, and companies in respecting the rights of persons with disabilities. This research uses juridical-normative research methods by reviewing the law from various aspects and approaches to the legislation concerned. The nature of this research is descriptive-analytical research, which is a method of taking existing data so that it can be described more fully. Persons with disabilities have the right to obtain guarantees of legal protection through guarantees of rights that are expressly stated in laws and regulations regarding persons with disabilities, including having guarantees of freedom from neglect, exclusion, discrimination, threats to respect for integrity. Persons with disabilities have the right to get a job according to the level of disability as well as employers guarantee the protection of workers with disabilities according to the level of disability of these workers.
Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen Pada “Warung Sederhana Gang Lebar, Wonocolo, Surabaya Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Uin Sunan Ampel Surabaya Zahroh, Ma'rufatul; Nabila, Salma; Adawiyah, Robiatul; Anas, Fakhrizal; Faizah, Syarifah; Trisna Wahyudi, M. Adi
JAMBIS : Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Vol. 4 No. 4: Agustus 2024
Publisher : JAMBIS : Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31334/jambis.v4i4.4499

Abstract

Warung Sederhana is an eatery located in Gang Lebar, Wonocolo, Surabaya. Although there are many competitors, “Warung Sederhana remains the top choice among students. This study aims to analyze the factors that influence consumer purchasing decisions at “Warung Sederhana. The method used is a   qualitative approach with a case study research type. Data was collected through interviews and observations. The results showed that the main factors that influence purchasing decisions are price, location, food quality, service, and recommendations from friends. Affordable prices and satisfying flavors are the main reasons students choose this shop. This research contributes to understanding consumer behavior in the micro business sector and can be a reference for stall owners in formulating more effective marketing strategies
Legal Certainty of Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency Decisions That Exceed the Dispute Resolution Deadline Faizah, Syarifah; Marina, Liza; Sunarsi, Dessy
Batulis Civil Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): VOLUME 7 ISSUE 2, JULY 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/ballrev.v7i2.3779

Abstract

Introduction: The Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency is mandated under Law Number 8 of 1999 Concerning Consumer Protection to resolve consumer disputes within 21 working days as stipulated in Article 55. However, in practice, several Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency decisions exceed this statutory time limit, raising questions regarding legal certainty and the validity of such decisions. This issue reflects normative inconsistencies and practical obstacles in the implementation of consumer dispute resolution mechanisms in Indonesia. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the legal certainty of Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency decisions rendered beyond the 21-working-day time limit under Article 55 of the Consumer Protection Act and to identify the obstacles causing such delays, along with the proposed solutions. Methods of the Research: This research employs a normative-empirical juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through library research and field research, including interviews with members of Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency in Bogor City and Bogor Regency. Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings indicate that Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency decisions issued beyond the statutory time limit lack legal certainty and may be considered legally flawed or null and void due to non-compliance with Article 55 of the Consumer Protection Act. The obstacles contributing to delays stem from internal factors, such as limited human resources with legal backgrounds and the absence of a specific procedural law, as well as external factors, including the non-attendance of disputing parties and difficulties in reaching agreements. The study recommends revising the Consumer Protection Act to strengthen BPSK’s institutional authority, standardize procedural regulations (including verification and validation mechanisms), and improve the quality and accountability of its human resources.