Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Ipso Jure

The Impact Of Implementing Legislation For Individuals Who Commit Crimes In The Marine Environment Is Currently Being Assessed Kumalasari, Dewi Ratih
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024): Ipso Jure- June
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/7ssmks72

Abstract

This research is entitled Legal Sanctions for Perpetrators of Marine Ecosystem Crime because they want to emphasize that everyone, both individuals and corporations, who commit environmental damage, especially marine ecosystems, must be responsible for their actions and be ready to face criminal sanctions in accordance with statutory regulations. This research uses normative juridical legal research methods, using three approaches: statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The research materials used in this research are primary and secondary legal materials. In writing this article, deductive analysis was used to organize data and research. This method of investigation is based on general principles to explain specific events or general theories based on concrete facts. The aim of this research is to find and analyze law enforcement against individuals who commit violations of destroying marine ecosystems. The research findings indicate that countries are responsible for preserving marine ecosystems through effective regulation and law enforcement. However, the implementation of these regulations still faces challenges, such as limited resources and coordination among agencies. The study provides recommendations to strengthen the role of countries in preserving marine ecosystems, including enhancing institutional capacity, strengthening law enforcement, and forming partnerships with the private sector and communities
Measuring The Law On The Formation Of Laws And Regulations As A Touchstone Constitutional Review Djalil, Mochamad; Kumalasari, Dewi Ratih
Ipso Jure Vol. 2 No. 7 (2025): Ipso Jure - August
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/f9hbej92

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional supremacy in shaping statutory regulations, positioning it both as a guiding framework and a binding compliance standard for the public particularly state authorities and their institutions. It argues that the Law on the Formation of Laws and Regulations serves as a definitive and legitimate benchmark in constitutional review. Nonetheless, practical realities reveal instances where the principle of utility can override arguments concerning formal defects in legislation and Government Regulations in Lieu of Law (Perppu). Employing a normative legal research method that integrates statutory and conceptual approaches, this paper provides a descriptive analysis of the issue. The findings indicate that constitutional review functions as an embodiment of constitutional supremacy through the judicial examination of laws, with the Law on the Formation of Laws and Regulations serving as a key parameter in determining constitutionality a parameter whose application continues to evolve.