Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJLRSA Integralistik
Muchtarom
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Law on Interfaith Marriage Perspective of Al-Quran Education on Indonesian Government Regulations and Legislation Muchtarom
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): March-April : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v2i2.112

Abstract

This research aims to analyze. M. Quraish Shihab and Al-Maraghi's interpretation of interfaith marriages. The relevance of interpreting interfaith marriages according to M. Quraish Shihab and Al-Maraghi. The research method with a qualitative approach describes the findings that occurred. Data Analysis Techniques use (1). Content analysis is an in-depth discussion of written information in mass media. (2). Using a comparative method, By comparing (1). Tafsir M. Quraish Shihab and Al-Maraghi regarding interfaith marriages (a). The marriage of Muslim men and women of the People of the Book, and both are permitted. (b) The marriage of Muslim women to Muslim men and People of the Book is haram (2) The relevance of M. Quraish Shihab and Al-Maraghi regarding interfaith marriages in Indonesian law (a). The marriage of a Muslim man to an Ahl al-Kitab woman is not relevant to article no. 1 of 1974. KHI article 2 paragraph (1) and 1 of 1991 Articles 4, 40, 44 and 61 concerning Marriage (b) Marriage of Muslim men with polytheist women, relevant article No. 1 of 1974. KHI article 2 paragraph (1 ) No1 of 1991 Articles 4, 40, 44 and 61 marriage Marriage (c). The marriage of a Muslim woman to a Mushrik man and an Ahl Book is relevant to article no. 1 of 1974. KHI article 2 paragraph (1) Number 1 of 1991 Articles 4, 40, 44 and 61 concerning Marriage
Contribution of Inheritance Assets by Islamic Law for Inheritance Recipients as Community Education Muchtarom
The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): March-April : The International Journal of Law Review and State Administration
Publisher : PDPI (Perkumpulan Dosen Peneliti Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v2i2.113

Abstract

This research aims to find out the distribution of inheritance which is divided equally between men and women, and the practice of dividing inheritance regarding contributions to heirs. This research method is a qualitative approach, which describes the research object that occurs in the field. The data collection techniques used were interviews, observation, and documentation. Data analysis was carried out including data reduction, data presentation, and verification withdrawal. The results of the research reveal that: (1) Heirs receive assets equally between men and women through family consultation. After the assets are divided, there are remaining assets that are allocated by the heir to an heir who contributes to the heir during his or her lifetime. (2) The heirs who contribute to the inheritance receive more inheritance than the remaining assets after dividing them equally. The remaining assets in Islamic Inheritance, especially from a legal perspective, are not justified. Because, in Maqaşid shari'ah al-Khamsah, protection of religion is not implemented in society in terms of the division of inheritance between men and women. However, protection for the existence of religious descendants, as well as protection for assets, all of which are at a secondary or tertiary level, have been fulfilled.
Filsafat Pendidikan Pancasila dalam Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum Merdeka: Analisis Komparatif Landasan Filosofis Winarno, Winarno; Heri Santoso; Yuyus Kardiman; Muchtarom
Integralistik Vol. 37 No. 1 (2026): Januari :2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/integralistik.v37i1.34147

Abstract

Pancasila, as the state foundation and philosophical basis of national education mandated by the National Education System Law Article 2, should serve as an ontological, epistemological, and axiological foundation in every national curriculum. This study aims to analyze and compare the educational philosophy underlying two curriculums and assess the extent to which Pancasila’s educational philosophy is adopted as a philosophical basis. The method used comparative analysis of official curriculum documents, namely Permendikbud No. 57–59 of 2014 (2013 Curriculum) and Permendikbudristek No. 12 of 2024 and Permendikdasmen No. 13 of 2025 (Merdeka Curriculum). The analysis employed thematic content analysis across three dimensions: (1) Philosophical Foundation, (2) Integration of Pancasila, and (3) Philosophical Depth. Results show that the 2013 Curriculum is dominated by progressivism and essentialism philosophies, with partial and normative-moral integration of Pancasila limited to the first three principles. In contrast, the Merdeka Curriculum integrates Pancasila holistically across eight graduate profile dimensions, covering all principles and beginning to engage ontological, epistemological, and axiological levels through a deep learning approach. The Merdeka Curriculum aligns more closely with the idealistic philosophy of Pancasila education than the 2013 Curriculum. The findings imply a need for an explicit philosophical foundation in the curriculum and adequate teacher training so that Pancasila becomes a strong philosophical foundation rather than merely a normative message.
Co-Authors Heri Santoso Winarno Winarno Yuyus Kardiman