Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara International Journal of Social Science and Humanity
Adiatma Nugroho
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Efektivitas Penegakan Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Baku Mutu Udara Di Wilayah Industri Syabilal Ali; Adiatma Nugroho; Jimmi Dohar Pandapotan; Irwan Triadi
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): September : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i3.527

Abstract

Indonesia's land is not doing well now, because there is a lot of pollution, especially air pollution, which is very worrying. It was proven that in Jakarta in 2021, for 3 (three) days, the sky in Jakarta was covered with fog, which turned out to be pollution. It was created by the people of Jakarta, starting from factory fumes, then motor vehicle fumes. Based on the example above, there are actually regulations that regulate the monitoring and/or control of fumes coming out of factories or motorized vehicles, but up to now there are still many people being overlooked regarding air pollution. The method used in this research is normative juridical or library research, with a statutory approach to issues. That protection for the public against air pollution in general already exists in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management Jo. Government Regulation Number 41 of 1999 concerning Control of Air Pollution, but the implementation regarding law enforcement by Environmental Law Enforcers is not optimal, so there is a need for cooperation between the community and the government.
Pembuktian Ilmiah VS Alibi: Bagaimana Ilmu Forensik Mengatasi Tantangan Pembelaan pada Kasus Raden Adante Adiatma Nugroho; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.955

Abstract

Scientific evidence has become an important element in modern criminal justice, especially in complex cases such as Raden Adante, where alibis are used as the main defense strategy to undermine forensic evidence. In this case, scientific methods such as DNA analysis, digital traces, and toxicology examination succeeded in breaking the defendant's alibi. This research examines how scientific evidence can overcome the challenges of alibi strategies which are often used to confuse the investigative process. This study shows that accurate and standardized forensic evidence is able to objectively confirm the presence of the defendant at the scene of the crime, thereby strengthening fair and effective law enforcement efforts. The research uses a juridical-normative approach with qualitative analysis, examining regulations, legal doctrine, and expert views to assess the role of scientific evidence in dealing with alibi defenses.
Pretrial Proceedings in Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law: Its Relation to Corruption Eradication Adiatma Nugroho; Beniharmoni Harefa; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Social Science and Humanity
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijss.v2i2.375

Abstract

Pretrial proceedings play a strategic role in Indonesia's criminal justice system as a judicial oversight mechanism to ensure the legality of law enforcement actions and the protection of suspects’ human rights. In corruption cases, however, pretrial motions are often exploited as procedural loopholes to invalidate ongoing investigations due to the absence of rigid legal standards and inconsistent interpretations by judges sometimes extending into the merits of the case, which should fall outside the scope of pretrial jurisdiction. This study examines the ideal concept of pretrial review using a normative juridical approach, emphasizing the due process of law principle, the primacy of lex specialis under Article 26A of the Anti-Corruption Law, and its harmonization with the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The research concludes that pretrial mechanisms should function solely as limited judicial review, restricted to evaluating procedural legality. Additionally, the study highlights the significance of establishing Preliminary Examination Judges (Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan) as proposed in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code. These judges would proactively supervise investigative actions, ensuring procedural compliance and minimizing the misuse of pretrial remedies by corruption suspects. Strengthening normative frameworks and judicial guidelines is thus essential to foster coherent, fair rulings and support the integrity and effectiveness of anti-corruption law enforcement.
Co-Authors Beniharmoni Harefa Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Irwan Triadi Jimmi Dohar Pandapotan Syabilal Ali