Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Zahri, Saipudin
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Settlement Of Divorce Cases Caused By Domestic Violence In The Palembang Religious Court (Ruling Number 280/Pdt.G/2022/Pa.Plg) Pratama, Rendy William Cahya; Zainuddin, Cholidi; Zahri, Saipudin
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 12, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v12i2.5509

Abstract

Marriage is a marriage carried out based on statutory regulations and religious teachings. Every person in this world certainly wants to have a family with the person they love, leave a legacy to continue the family lineage, and continue to protect their religion and country. Everyone dreams of a happy marriage full of love that can only end in death. The test must be done at home, so it must be done at your own pace. The current problem is domestic violence, which leads to deteriorating marital relations and divorce. The research used is empirical and legal research. And it includes the resolution of divorce cases based on domestic violence at the Palembang Religious Court (Decision No. 280/Pdt.G/2022/Pa.Plg). Findings: The process for resolving domestic divorce cases at the Palembang Religious Court is the same as the process for resolving other divorce cases, there are only slight differences. If the form of domestic violence is psychological, the evidence provided is in the form of a doctor's certificate, but in cases of physical violence, the evidence provided is not only in writing but must also be through statements from witnesses and victims. The process of resolving cases in court must use a trial agenda: reading of the complaint, mediation, answers and answers, evidence, conclusions, deliberation by the panel, and then reading of the verdict.Keywords: domestic violence; case resolution; Palembang Religious Court.
Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Atas Tindak Pidana Anak Yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama Ditinjau Dari Teori Keadilan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kayu Agung Nomor 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Kag) Wijaya, Andy; Zahri, Saipudin; Salia, Erli
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lexstricta.v4i1.1497

Abstract

Children who commit crimes must still be treated humanely by upholding the principles of non-discrimination, the best interests of the child, and respect for their right to life and development. This study examines the basis for the panel of judges' considerations regarding criminal acts committed by children jointly from the perspective of justice theory through a study of Kayu Agung District Court Decision Number 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Kag, as well as the legal remedies filed by the defendant against the decision. The method used is normative legal research supported by field data and is descriptive and analytical in nature. The results of the study show that the judges' considerations were based on philosophical aspects that emphasized rehabilitation for the defendants, thus reflecting the application of modern criminal law theory and some modern theories of justice. However, the defendants filed an objection because they considered that the verdict did not fully take into account mitigating factors, such as their confession and remorse for their actions, so the judges should have given more consideration to these factors before handing down the verdict.
Co-Authors Andy Wijaya Pratama, Rendy William Cahya Salia, Erli Zainuddin, Cholidi