Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Law, Development and Justice Review Indonesia Media Law Review
Zulfah, Shofiy
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengaturan Hukum dan Tanggung Jawab Komite Nasional Keselamatan Transportasi (KNKT) dalam Konteks Kecelakaan Pesawat Udara (Studi Kasus Jatuhnya SJ 182 di Perairan Kepulauan Seribu, Jakarta Utara) Sembiring, Mikhail Alvindra; Njatrijani, Rinitami; Zulfah, Shofiy; Wibowo, Benedictus Satryo; Lutfiyani, Fildzah
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 7, No 2 (2024): Law, Development & Justice Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.7.2024.104-123

Abstract

Kecelakaan SJ 182 menjadi sorotan utama dalam penerbangan sipil Indonesia, mendorong perlunya kajian mendalam terkait peran Komite Nasional Keselamatan Transportasi (KNKT) dalam investigasi kecelakaan pesawat. Analisis hukum pada regulasi penerbangan di Indonesia, termasuk Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerbangan dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 77 Tahun 2011 tentang Keselamatan Penerbangan Sipil, menjadi landasan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas peran KNKT. Penelitian ini juga membahas keterkaitan antara KNKT dengan otoritas penerbangan, maskapai, dan penyelenggara jasa penerbangan, serta dampaknya terhadap peningkatan keselamatan penerbangan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan perlunya peningkatan kerjasama antara KNKT, otoritas penerbangan, dan stakeholder terkait dalam proses investigasi. Pembaharuan regulasi yang lebih spesifik terkait tanggung jawab KNKT, termasuk rekomendasi dan tindak lanjut hasil investigasi, dianggap perlu untuk memastikan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan efektivitas dalam menjaga keselamatan penerbangan. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pemikiran terhadap pengembangan kerangka hukum yang mendukung fungsi KNKT dalam konteks investigasi kecelakaan pesawat udara.
Legal Responsibility of Digital Commerce Platforms for Seller Content that Violates Public Ethics Zulfah, Shofiy; Hapsari, Bunga Jasmine Puji; Rusda, Faza
Indonesia Media Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/imrev.v4i1.31016

Abstract

The rapid growth of the digital economy in Indonesia has drastically changed the nature of online commerce and prompted urgent considerations regarding the legal responsibilities of digital commerce platforms, especially user-generated content that violates public ethics. This article aims to analyze and compare the preventive, corrective, and compensatory obligations of digital platforms in Indonesia, the European Union, and the United States. This study uses normative legal research with comparative studies, reviewing the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (ITE) in Indonesia, the Digital Services Act of the European Union (EU), and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of the United States. The results show that Indonesia implements a knowledge-based and conditional liability system, which requires platforms to remove illegal content after receiving notification, but does not introduce an absolute liability system. The EU adopts a risk-based and proportional approach that reflects differences in the scale and impact of platforms, and focuses on systemic risk management and transparency. On the other hand, the US model tends to prioritize platform autonomy by providing broad immunity. The findings show that although Indonesian regulations are in line with innovation and consumer protection, they are still not strict enough in terms of systemic risks in algorithms and cultural commodification. This study emphasizes that adopting explicit risk assessment standards, enhanced transparency requirements, and stronger user compensation systems presents an opportunity for Indonesia, drawing on the experiences of the EU and the US, to achieve greater platform accountability and sustainable digital growth.
Copyright Protection of Computer Software: A Comparative Study of India and Indonesia Jened, Rahmi; Raharjo, Ignasius Sumarsono; Kumar, Abhishek; Rathi, Aditya; Sari, Betharia Noor Indah; Zulfah, Shofiy
LAW REFORM Vol 22, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v22i1.64235

Abstract

Since its invention around fifty years ago, computer technology has drastically changed people's lives. As well as providing various conveniences, the existence of computers has also given rise to a number of legal issues. This research project aims to examine comparative law in the context of copyright protection for computer programs in Indonesia and India. Multiple approaches were used: comparative, statutory, conceptual and case. The results obtained are as follows: (1) In Indonesia, a country with a civil law tradition, the benchmark for protecting authors is a reward system. Meanwhile, India, which has a common law legal tradition, uses a benchmark of copyright on the object of work creation as an incentive system;(2) The standard of copyrightability in Indonesia emphasises originality and creativity to a high degree. India, however, places more emphasis on fixation;(3) Both countries provide automatic protection for computer programs for a term of 50 years;(4) In Indonesia, copyright encompasses both economic and moral rights. India, however, places more emphasis on economic rights;(5) There are limitations and exceptions to author's rights in Indonesia. India has a system of fair use or fair dealing;(6) Copyright infringement can be direct or indirect. In Indonesia, law enforcement includes criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment and fines. In India, it is mostly based on civil lawsuits and damages.
Co-Authors Abhishek Kumar Hapsari, Bunga Jasmine Puji Lutfiyani, Fildzah Raharjo, Ignasius Sumarsono Rahmi Jened Rathi, Aditya Rinitami Njatrijani Rusda, Faza Sari, Betharia Noor Indah Sembiring, Mikhail Alvindra Wibowo, Benedictus Satryo