Firdaus, Elsa Illaila
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Sanksi Pidana Kurir Narkotika Antar Provinsi Dalam Bentuk Tanaman Firdaus, Elsa Illaila; Kurniasari, Rika
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2024): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v9i1.3246

Abstract

Law Number 35 of 2009 emphasizes that judges can decide or determine drug dealers, intermediaries and addicts to undergo treatment and/or treatment. How do judges consider at the appellate level in deciding cases against intermediaries in the sale and purchase of class I narcotics in the form of plants between provinces? How are law enforcement efforts to tackle the distribution of class I narcotics in the form of plants between provinces? The research method used in this writing is normative juridical and empirical juridical. The data used is secondary data and primary data. Data analysis uses qualitative juridical analysis. Research Results: There are 2 (two) factors that influence the judge's considerations in deciding cases against middlemen in the sale and purchase of class I narcotics in the form of plants between provinces, namely: Juridical factors and non-juridical factors. Law enforcement efforts, in this case the Judge, to tackle the circulation of class I narcotics in the form of crops between provinces are carried out at the implementation stage of the Judge's decision
Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Perkara Perdata Tentang Dugaan Penyelundupan Perjanjian Yang Menyebabkan Pemalsuan Jual-Beli Robianti, Masayu; Firdaus, Elsa Illaila
VIVA THEMIS Vol 8, No 2 (2025): VIVA THEMIS
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/vt.v8i2.4416

Abstract

This research employs normative and empirical juridical methods to examine a civil court decision between PT Cahaya Batu Limau and Vital Element Investment, concerning alleged contract smuggling and document forgery in a sale and purchase transaction. The case arose from an investment cooperation agreement that was unilaterally converted into a sale and purchase deed without one party’s consent, leading to a dispute over the validity of asset transfer. Findings indicate that altering a legal relationship without mutual consent violates Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code, while the use of forged documents breaches Article 263 of the Criminal Code, creating both civil and criminal implications. The court's decision is significant for understanding the boundary between civil and criminal law and how the court evaluates bad faith and evidence. This study recommends strengthening legal protection in investment agreements and enforcing due diligence in drafting authentic deeds to prevent misuse that harms one of the parties