Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Influence of self-efficacy, work discipline, and compensation on employee performance through work motivation in textile and garment companies in West Java Sjarifudin, Didin; Widyastuti, Tri; Renwarin, Joseph MJ; Suroso, Sugeng
Annals of Human Resource Management Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/ahrmr.v5i2.2953

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of self-efficacy, work discipline, and compensation on employee performance through work motivation in textile and garment companies in West Java. Methodology/approach: The method used in this study is descriptive quantitative. The population in this study is unknown, with a sample size of 370 respondents. The data used in this study are primary and secondary. The analytical tools used in this study include SmartPLS. The tests conducted in this study include Validity Test, Reliability Test, Inner Model, Outer Model, and Hypothesis Testing. Results/findings: The results of the study conducted on Textile and Garment Companies in West Java are as follows: 1) Self-efficacy has a positive and significant effect on motivation; 2) Work discipline has no effect and is not significant on motivation; 3) Compensation has no effect and is not significant on motivation; 4) Self-efficacy has a positive and significant effect on employee performance; 5) Work discipline has a positive and significant effect on employee performance; 6) Compensation has a positive and significant effect on employee performance; 7) Motivation has a positive and significant effect on employee performance; 8) Self-efficacy has a positive and significant effect on employee performance through motivation; 9) Work discipline does not have a positive and significant effect on employee performance through motivation; and 10) Compensation does not have a positive and significant effect on employee performance through motivation. Conclusions: The study concludes that self-efficacy significantly enhances both work motivation and employee performance, with motivation acting as a mediating factor. Work discipline directly improves performance but does not significantly affect motivation. Compensation shows no significant effect on either motivation or performance. Work motivation itself has a strong positive impact on performance. Indirectly, only self-efficacy improves performance via motivation, while work discipline and compensation do not demonstrate such mediation.. Limitations: This study is limited to Employee Performance and Work Motivation. Contribution: This study contributes to the understanding of factors that influence employee performance, focusing on factors such as self-efficacy, work discipline, compensation, and work motivation.
The Influence of self-efficacy, work discipline, and compensation on employee performance through work motivation in textile and garment companies in West Java Sjarifudin, Didin; Widyastuti, Tri; Renwarin, Joseph MJ; Suroso, Sugeng
Annals of Human Resource Management Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): June
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/ahrmr.v5i2.2953

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of self-efficacy, work discipline, and compensation on employee performance through work motivation in textile and garment companies in West Java. Methodology/approach: This study uses a descriptive quantitative approach with 370 respondents from an unknown population. Data were analyzed using SmartPLS through validity and reliability tests, inner and outer model evaluations, and hypothesis testing to ensure accuracy and reliability of findings. Results/findings: 1) Self-efficacy has a positive and significant effect on motivation; 2) Work discipline has no effect and is not significant on motivation; 3) Compensation has no effect and is not significant on motivation; 4) Self-efficacy has a positive and significant effect on employee performance; 5) Work discipline has a positive and significant effect on employee performance; 6) Compensation has a positive and significant effect on employee performance; 7) Motivation has a positive and significant effect on employee performance; 8) Self-efficacy has a positive and significant effect on employee performance through motivation; 9) Work discipline does not have a positive and significant effect on employee performance through motivation; and 10) Compensation does not have a positive and significant effect on employee performance through motivation. Conclusions: The study reveals that self-efficacy significantly enhances work motivation and performance, with motivation mediating this effect. Work discipline improves performance but not motivation, while compensation has no significant influence. Only self-efficacy indirectly boosts performance through motivation, highlighting motivation’s pivotal role in driving employee effectiveness and productivity. Limitations: This study is limited to Employee Performance and Work Motivation. Contribution: This study contributes to the understanding of factors that influence employee performance, focusing on factors such as self-efficacy, work discipline, compensation, and work motivation.