Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika
Rohmah, Ulya Shofirotur
Unknown Affiliation
Education Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Kelayakan LKPD Berbasis HOTS untuk Memfasilitasi Peserta Didik pada Materi SPLDV Alfi Mubarok, Muhammad Sa'dan; Rohmah, Ulya Shofirotur; Wijayanti, Ardhina; Nurhalimah, Siti; Anggraini, Rofiyu; Dewanti, Sintha Sih
Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Volume 8 Nomor 1
Publisher : Mathematics Education Study Program

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/cendekia.v8i1.1980

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis kelayakan lembar kerja peserta didik (LKPD) berbasis HOTS berdasarkan angket penilaian peserta didik terhadap media dan hasil tes kognitif. Subjek populasi penelitian adalah seluruh peserta didik kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 2 Depok. Subjek sampel penelitian ini meliputi 29 siswa kelas VIIIB dan 3 peserta didik kelas VIIIA dengan kemampuan matematis berbeda. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode campuran dan evaluasi formatif. Teknik pengumpulan data penelitian dilakukan melalui observasi, angket, dan tes. Lembar validasi ahli, angket penilaian peserta didik, dan hasil tes kognitif menjadi instrumen dalam penelitian ini. Kerangka kerja penelitian di mulai dengan mencari LKPD yang akan di uji, mengembangkan instrumen validasi dan angket penilaian peserta didik, uji skala satu lawan satu, skala besar, dan analisis data. Analisis data hasil observasi, wawancara, dan instrumen penelitian dilakukan dengan analisis deskriptif. Penelitian ini menghasilkan bahwa LKPD berbasis HOTS dengan materi sistem persamaan linear dua variabel (SPLDV) dalam kategori baik. Namun, hasil tes kognitif menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada dari separuh peserta didik yang lulus KKM. Peserta didik tidak terbiasa menggunakan LKPD dan peserta didik kesulitan memahami maksud dari setiap aktivitas yang ada. Klaim dari LKPD ini merupakan LKPD berbasis HOTS, tetapi permasalahan yang disajikan belum sampai pada taraf kategori soal HOTS.
Penilaian otentik kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP Kelas VIII pada materi statistika Wijayanti, Ardhina; Nursaadah, Ida; Faslurrohman, Muhammad; Muna, Khozainul; Rohmah, Ulya Shofirotur; Dewanti, Sintha Sih
Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika Vol 10 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29407/jmen.v10i1.20266

Abstract

Mathematical critical thinking is essential for students in the twenty-first century. People become more adaptive, open-minded, and better able to react to a range of events and problems as their critical thinking skills grow. The ability for children to think critically is still quite limited. The lack of instruction that fosters mathematical critical thinking skills is to blame for this. After giving students a mathematical critical thinking stimulus while they were studying, this study aims to assess students' capacity to use critical math thinking on statistical content. The research technique used is called qualitative descriptive research. Data collection techniques include test-and-nontest approaches. Analysis of critical thinking skills is done by looking at assessment, assumption analysis, and argument analysis. Students from SMP Negeri 9 Yogyakarta in grade VIII made up the research sample. This research produces three categories of students' critical thinking abilities, namely: 1) high category students are able to analyze assumptions, analyze arguments, and evaluate; 2) medium category students are able to analyze arguments and evaluate, but are still not capable enough to analyze assumptions; and 3) low category students are not yet able to analyze assumptions, analyze arguments, and evaluate.
Co-Authors Alfi Mubarok, Muhammad Sa'dan Anggraini, Rofiyu Faslurrohman, Muhammad Muna, Khozainul Nursaadah, Ida Sintha Sih Dewanti Siti Nurhalimah Wijayanti, Ardhina