Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika Sosial Journal of Transcendental Law
Moh. Nizar
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Mainstreaming the Realism Paradigm on Eradication of Corruption Through Analysis of Law (Undang-Undang) No. 19 of 2019 Concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption Musyaffa, Nadhif Fadhlan; Paksi, Arie Kusuma; Moh. Nizar
Journal of Transcendental Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Transcendental Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jtl.v5i1.1915

Abstract

Through an analysis of Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, this paper analyzes the paradigm adopted by the Indonesian government when formulating strategies to combat corruption. Since their inception in 1957, laws and regulations on combating corruption have changed to reflect the evolution of the problem, the causes of corruption's growth in Indonesia, the dynamics of politics and the economy, and other aspects. The formation of Indonesia's Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in 2003, which performs a number of tasks, was a turning point in the country's efforts to eradicate corruption. With the publication of Law No. 19 of 2019, which replaces Law No. 30 of 2002 with the eradication of criminal acts of corruption, reform was also continued. This writing aims to analyze and measure the paradigm used by the Indonesian government in making policies to eradicate corruption through the analysis of Law no. 19 of 2019. The author uses the content analysis method in analyzing the law. Analysis was carried out on three indicators; actors, authorities, and governance which represent the three paradigms; realism (state), liberalism (non-state), and constructivism (social construction). Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that; Law No. 19 of 2019 is strongly influenced by the realism paradigm, and although the law is appropriate to replace the previous law, the law still has several weaknesses to be corrected and revised by the government.
PARTICIPATION OF VOTERS WITH DISABILITIES IN ELECTION IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KPU STRATEGIES IN SEMARANG AND MALANG Nurul Alam, Sutan Agung; Cahyo Seftyono; Moh. Nizar
Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika Sosial Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): September
Publisher : Program Studi Sosiologi Universitas Malikussaleh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/jsds.v11i2.23781

Abstract

Voters with disabilities still face a number of structural and cultural barriers in exercising their right to vote. Therefore, the approach taken by the General Elections Commission (KPU) in ensuring inclusive participation is crucial to analyses. This study aims to explore differences in the approaches used, the factors that influence them, and provide suggestions for implementing more disability-friendly elections in various locations. This paper will compare the KPU strategies in Semarang City and Malang City in encouraging disabled voter participation in the 2024 General Election using a comparative literature study method analyzed using Peter Schroder's political strategy theory. Data were collected through literature studies and in-depth interviews with several informants. The study's findings indicate that the Malang City Election Commission (KPU) was more innovative, involving democracy volunteers, providing specialized services at polling stations (TPS), and building close collaborations with various institutions. In contrast, the Semarang City Election Commission (KPU) took a more cautious approach, focusing primarily on digital service innovation. However, other strategies, such as voter education and outreach, remained passive and limited in scope, as they did not reach all groups of people with disabilities, particularly those not integrated into formal communities.
Co-Authors Cahyo Seftyono Nadhif Fadhlan Musyaffa Nurul Alam, Sutan Agung Paksi, Arie Kusuma