Nur Baiti Hidayah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Peran Ganda Mahasiswa STDI Imam Syafi’i Jember Berkeluarga Sebagai Kepala Keluarga dan Tholibul Ilmi Nur Baiti Hidayah
USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/usrah.v5i2.1325

Abstract

Education and marriage are noble acts of worship in the sight of Allah. It is common for young people to get married after completing their undergraduate education, but there are those who get married before completing their university studies, one of the aims of which is to avoid the sin of adultery and its intermediaries. Having a dual role as head of the family and tholibul ilmi is a great combination of worship to Allah Ta'ala. This research aims to open people's minds so that they do not feel hesitant to take the level of marriage with their condition as tholibul ilmi, because in fact there is no limit to learning and marriage is not a barrier to continuing education at a higher level. This research is a qualitative study that combines field and library research methods to obtain research data. The results of this study indicate that dual role owners must be able to divide time for each role and obligation, they must also have strategies to deal with challenges and conflicts that occur, they also have an afterlife orientation as a motivation in studying religious knowledge, and the importance of religious knowledge in family life, especially in children's education. Keywords:  Dual Role; Head of the Family; Knowledge Claimant.
BETWEEN TRADITION AND CRITICISM: AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF MUSTAFA AL-SIBĀʿĪ’S RESPONSE TO ORIENTALIST HADITH SCHOLARSHIP Muhammad Ilyas; Abdullah Alifuddin Prasetyo; Nur Baiti Hidayah
EL-MAQRA' Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Mei
Publisher : IAIN KENDARI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/elmaqra.v6i1.14338

Abstract

This study examines the epistemological structure underlying Mustafa al-Sibāʿī’s critique of Orientalist Hadith scholarship. Previous studies tend to portray his approach as objective and balanced, yet they largely remain descriptive and fail to critically interrogate its epistemological foundations. This study addresses this gap by analyzing whether al-Sibāʿī’s critique constitutes a genuinely critical engagement or primarily a normative defense of the Hadith tradition. Employing a qualitative library-based method, this research integrates discourse analysis, content analysis, and comparative epistemological analysis. The study focuses on al-Sibāʿī’s major works and compares his arguments with key Orientalist scholars such as Ignaz Goldziher and Joseph Schacht, as well as with contemporary Muslim scholars like Mustafa al-Aʿẓamī. The findings reveal that al-Sibāʿī combines internal Hadith criticism with selective empirical reasoning; however, his framework remains rooted in a tradition-based epistemology that produces asymmetrical critique. This study argues that the debate between classical Hadith scholarship and Orientalism reflects a contest between distinct epistemological systems. The novelty of this research lies in providing a systematic epistemological evaluation of al-Sibāʿī’s critique beyond descriptive and apologetic approaches.