Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Attractive : Innovative Education Journal Moderasi : Journal of Islamic Studies Jurnal Dirosah Islamiyah
Fahmi Husen
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pendekatan Hadis dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur'an : Mendedah Metode Al-Bukhārī dalam Kitab Shaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī Muhammad Alamudin; Ahmad Nurhamdani; Iqbal Nursyahbani; Fahmi Husen; Syafi’i, Ahmad Musta’in
Moderasi : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Lajnah Ta'lif wan Nasyr Nahdlatul Ulama (LTN-NU) Kabupaten Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54471/moderasi.v5i1.92

Abstract

The interpretation of the Qur'an remains a controversial issue among Muslims. The various methods of interpretation employed by scholars have led to differing opinions regarding the meanings and implications of Qur'anic verses. In this context, the hadith approach as a primary source for interpreting the Qur'an becomes crucial. Al-Bukhārī, as one of the prominent hadith scholars, possesses a unique method of using hadith as a source for Qur'anic interpretation. This research aims to analyze Al-Bukhārī's method in utilizing hadith as a source for interpreting the Qur'an and its implications for understanding the Qur'an. By employing a qualitative research method, this study analyzes the book of Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī as a primary data source. The findings indicate that Al-Bukhārī uses hadith as a source for interpreting the Qur'an to clarify the meanings of its verses and to establish Islamic laws. The implications of this research suggest that the hadith approach in interpreting the Qur'an can aid in clarifying its meanings and establishing more accurate legal rulings.
Tinjauan Al-Ghazālī terhadap Ilmu Kalam dan Pendekatan Berargumen dalam Kitab Al-Iqtiṣād Fī Al-I’tiqād Iqbal Nursyahbani; Ahmad Nurhamdani; Fahmi Husen; Mohammad Farid
Attractive : Innovative Education Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Attractive : Innovative Education Journal
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/aj.v6i2.1248

Abstract

All-Ghazali is one of the Muslim intellectuals who is very persistent in fighting against deviant understanding in Kalam science. One of his works is the book al-Iqtiṣād fi al-I'tiqād, the introduction to the book contains al-Ghazali's attitude and review in Kalam science as well as his argumentative methodology in Kalam science. So this feels necessary to be expressed. For this reason, this research is present to reveal al-Ghazali's review and methodology in his book. Therefore, this study focuses on content analysis methods and describes those contained in the introduction to the book al-Iqtiṣād fi al-I'tiqād. It can be concluded that al-Ghazali had a view of how important the science of Kalam was, so that al-Ghazali divided humans into four groups even though deepening it was only mandatory for certain people. And al-Ghazali has three methods in arguing, namely, as-Sabru wat Taqsim, Qiyas Hamli, and explaining that the opponent's argument is wrong.
Metode Ulama’ Mutaqaddimīn dan Muta'akhirīn dalam Ta'līl Ḥadīṡ: Studi Komparatif Pemikiran al-Dāruquṭnī dan al-Albānī Iqbal Nursyahbani; Fahmi Husen; Muhammad Alamudin; Ahmad Nurhamdani; Ahmad ‘Ubaydi Hasbillah
Jurnal Dirosah Islamiyah Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Dirosah Islamiyah
Publisher : Pascasarjana IAI Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/jdi.v6i3.5241

Abstract

This study aims to compare the ta'lil (causality) method used by two great scholars in the field of hadith, namely al-Daruqutni and al-Albani. The ta'lil method is an approach used to classify hadiths based on their strength or weakness. They both represent two different periods in the history of hadith, namely the ulama' mutaqaddimīn (early period) and the ulama' muta'akhirīn (modern period). This study uses a comparative approach by analyzing the written works of the two scholars. The results of the study show that these two 'ulama', despite coming from different eras, both have a deep concern for hadith. They also have their own methods in knowing the 'illat (defects) that exist in the hadith. Imam al-Dāruquṭnī's method in researching 'illat in a hadith is focused on research in the sanad or the narrators of the hadith. He also considers that the study of al-jarḥ wa al-ta'dīl (criticism and authentication of narrators) is also included in the study of the 'illat of hadith, so al-Dāruquṭnī often examines the hadith narrators from that perspective. Meanwhile, Shaykh al-Albānī has a more in-depth research method on the 'illat in the hadith. He is not only focused on the study of the 'illat of hadith in terms of the sanad and narrators, but his study also touches on the research of the matn (text) of the hadith. Therefore, it becomes reasonable that al-Dāruquṭnī is more lenient in determining the validity of a hadith, and al-Albānī is more strict in determining the validity of a hadith. Keywords: Ta’līl; Hadith; al-Dāruquṭnī; al-Albānī
Co-Authors Ahmad Nurhamdani Hasbillah, Ahmad Ubaydi Iqbal Nursyahbani Mohammad Farid Muhammad Alamudin Syafi’i, Ahmad Musta’in