Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Loso loso
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara

 1 
Urgensi Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Manusia di Kamboja Menurut Tinjauan Hukum Internasional Nealam Callista; Adinda Sawitri; Risma Alya Roshanti; Putri Rahmawati; Loso Loso; Ganis Vitayanty Noor
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): May : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v2i3.258

Abstract

Human trafficking is a serious and growing crime, including in Cambodia, which has become one of the countries vulnerable to this practice. This study aims to analyze the handling of human trafficking crimes in Cambodia from an international law perspective. Cambodia plays a significant role in the context of human trafficking due to its geographic location and socio-economic conditions, which influence the rate of human trafficking, whether for sexual exploitation, forced labor, or organ trafficking. This research uses a qualitative method with a literature review approach from various sources, including international conventions, reports from international organizations, and Cambodia's national regulations. The findings show that although Cambodia has adopted several laws to combat human trafficking, the implementation of these policies is often hindered by limited resources, corruption, and lack of cooperation between countries. Additionally, despite efforts from the international community, such as the Palermo Protocol, challenges in consistently applying the law remain a significant barrier. The study also finds that stricter law enforcement and better rehabilitation systems for victims are necessary to improve the situation. Therefore, further collaboration between the Cambodian government, international organizations, and non-governmental organizations is needed to comprehensively address this issue.
Analisis Sengketa Kepulauan Senkaku : Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Geopolitik Asia Timur Diva Catur Widiyanto; Muchammad Fadhil; Restu Gesang Maulana; Mohammad Orlin Parusa; Loso Loso; Ganis Vitayanty Noor
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): May : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v2i3.259

Abstract

The Senkaku Islands dispute involves Japan, China, and Taiwan on the basis of historical claims, international law, and strategic and economic interests. The strategic value of this region increases along with the potential of natural resources and the importance of maritime routes in the East China Sea. The main problems in this research are, first, how is the chronology of the Senkaku Islands dispute, and second, how is the analysis of international law on the sovereignty claims of each party. This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical method, which is based on a literature study of international legal documents, scientific journals, and various related official sources. The results show that Japan controls the Senkaku Islands de facto and strengthens its claim based on the principle of effectiveness. In contrast, China and Taiwan make claims based on the history of the Ming and Qing Dynasties but have no actual control over the territory. The dispute is further complicated by the United States' security support for Japan, as well as increased maritime and military patrol activities around the disputed area. Efforts to resolve the dispute through the International Court of Justice have been stymied by Japan's refusal to recognize the dispute and China's caution in taking the case to international law. Overall, the dispute has not only a legal dimension, but also reflects the sharp geopolitical competition in the East Asian region. Resolving this dispute requires a flexible diplomatic approach, given that formal legal channels are difficult to pursue. Multilateral dialog is the key to preventing conflict escalation that could threaten regional stability.
Co-Authors Adelia Adelia Adinda Sawitri Diva Catur Widiyanto Dwi Edi Wibowo Ganis Vitayanty Noor Mohammad Orlin Parusa Muchammad Fadhil Nealam Callista Pesona Bias Pelangi Karina Putri Putri Rahmawati Restu Gesang Maulana Risma Alya Roshanti Yuniarti .