Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Loso loso
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Genosida Terhadap Warga Sipil: Evaluasi Terhadap Mekanisme Akuntabilitas Hukum Secara Internasional Pesona Bias Pelangi Karina Putri; Adelia Adelia; Ganis Vitayanty Noor; Loso Loso
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i2.1527

Abstract

Genocide against civilians constitutes a severe infringement upon fundamental human rights, demanding a firm response from the international community. This crime not only causes immense suffering for its victims but also poses a serious threat to global stability. Legal accountabillity for perpetrators of genocide is a crucial aspect pertaining to the global framework of international law. In this articles evaluates the mechanisms of legal accountability, highlighting the effectiveness, challenges, and opportunities faced by Judicial bodies like the International Criminal Court (ICC) and temporary tribunals such as the ICTR and ICTY. By examining genocide incidents from the 20th and 21st centuries, the research highlights various shortcomings in the accountability framework, such as political interference, inconsistent legal enforcement, and insufficient international collaboration from member states in extraditing suspects. Legal and administrative obstacles, such as evidence collection and witness protection, also hinder judicial processes. Nevertheless, there are opportunities to enhance the system’s effectiveness, including strengthening the authority of international judicial bodies, improving inter-state coordination, and utilizing technology in genocide investigations. By addressing these shortcomings, the international legal system is expected to become more effective in upholding justice and preventing future acts of genocide.
Urgensi Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Manusia di Kamboja Menurut Tinjauan Hukum Internasional Nealam Callista; Adinda Sawitri; Risma Alya Roshanti; Putri Rahmawati; Loso Loso; Ganis Vitayanty Noor
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): May : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v2i3.258

Abstract

Human trafficking is a serious and growing crime, including in Cambodia, which has become one of the countries vulnerable to this practice. This study aims to analyze the handling of human trafficking crimes in Cambodia from an international law perspective. Cambodia plays a significant role in the context of human trafficking due to its geographic location and socio-economic conditions, which influence the rate of human trafficking, whether for sexual exploitation, forced labor, or organ trafficking. This research uses a qualitative method with a literature review approach from various sources, including international conventions, reports from international organizations, and Cambodia's national regulations. The findings show that although Cambodia has adopted several laws to combat human trafficking, the implementation of these policies is often hindered by limited resources, corruption, and lack of cooperation between countries. Additionally, despite efforts from the international community, such as the Palermo Protocol, challenges in consistently applying the law remain a significant barrier. The study also finds that stricter law enforcement and better rehabilitation systems for victims are necessary to improve the situation. Therefore, further collaboration between the Cambodian government, international organizations, and non-governmental organizations is needed to comprehensively address this issue.
Analisis Sengketa Kepulauan Senkaku : Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Geopolitik Asia Timur Diva Catur Widiyanto; Muchammad Fadhil; Restu Gesang Maulana; Mohammad Orlin Parusa; Loso Loso; Ganis Vitayanty Noor
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): May : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v2i3.259

Abstract

The Senkaku Islands dispute involves Japan, China, and Taiwan on the basis of historical claims, international law, and strategic and economic interests. The strategic value of this region increases along with the potential of natural resources and the importance of maritime routes in the East China Sea. The main problems in this research are, first, how is the chronology of the Senkaku Islands dispute, and second, how is the analysis of international law on the sovereignty claims of each party. This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical method, which is based on a literature study of international legal documents, scientific journals, and various related official sources. The results show that Japan controls the Senkaku Islands de facto and strengthens its claim based on the principle of effectiveness. In contrast, China and Taiwan make claims based on the history of the Ming and Qing Dynasties but have no actual control over the territory. The dispute is further complicated by the United States' security support for Japan, as well as increased maritime and military patrol activities around the disputed area. Efforts to resolve the dispute through the International Court of Justice have been stymied by Japan's refusal to recognize the dispute and China's caution in taking the case to international law. Overall, the dispute has not only a legal dimension, but also reflects the sharp geopolitical competition in the East Asian region. Resolving this dispute requires a flexible diplomatic approach, given that formal legal channels are difficult to pursue. Multilateral dialog is the key to preventing conflict escalation that could threaten regional stability.
Pelaksanaan Good Governance dalam Administrasi Proyek Publik Widya Pramana, Agus Pawitra; S.Sami'an; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi; Loso Loso
Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi (Januari - Februari 2026)
Publisher : Dinasti Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jemsi.v7i3.7304

Abstract

Tata kelola yang baik berfungsi sebagai kerangka kerja kelembagaan yang penting untuk memastikan transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan efisiensi dalam administrasi proyek publik. Studi kualitatif ini meneliti implementasi prinsip-prinsip tata kelola yang baik dalam sistem administrasi proyek publik Indonesia, khususnya melalui mekanisme kelembagaan Komite Percepatan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Prioritas (KPPIP), PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (PT SMI), dan Dana Jaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia (PT PII/IIGF). Melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur dengan tiga puluh pemangku kepentingan proyek, termasuk pejabat pemerintah, manajer proyek, perwakilan sektor swasta, dan organisasi masyarakat sipil, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi mekanisme utama yang mengoperasionalkan tata kelola yang baik dan hambatan sistemik yang menghambat efektivitasnya. Studi ini mengungkapkan bahwa meskipun kerangka kerja kelembagaan untuk pengawasan tata kelola telah ada, kesenjangan yang signifikan tetap ada antara kebijakan yang dirumuskan dan praktik implementasi. Temuan utama menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme transparansi masih belum dikembangkan secara memadai, partisipasi pemangku kepentingan terbatas cakupannya, dan tantangan koordinasi antar berbagai lembaga melemahkan akuntabilitas. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa mengatasi kesenjangan implementasi ini tidak hanya membutuhkan penguatan mekanisme transparansi dan jalur partisipasi, tetapi juga peningkatan komitmen kepemimpinan, peningkatan koordinasi antar lembaga, dan pengembangan kapasitas di antara personel tata kelola. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pemahaman bagaimana prinsip-prinsip tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik dapat diterjemahkan secara efektif ke dalam praktik administrasi dalam konteks sektor publik Indonesia yang kompleks, serta menawarkan wawasan untuk reformasi kebijakan dan pembangunan kapasitas kelembagaan.
Co-Authors Adelia Adelia Adinda Sawitri Diva Catur Widiyanto Dwi Edi Wibowo Ganis Vitayanty Noor Mohammad Orlin Parusa Muchammad Fadhil Nealam Callista Pesona Bias Pelangi Karina Putri Putri Rahmawati Restu Gesang Maulana Risma Alya Roshanti S.Sami'an Sarwono Hardjomuljadi Widya Pramana, Agus Pawitra Yuniarti .