Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Role of Institutions Supporting the Investigation of Evidence in Money Laundering Crimes Using Cryptocurrency Susanto, Asmara Nova; Afifah, Wiwik
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i6.16726

Abstract

The purpose of writing the journal is to analyze the role of law enforcement agencies in tracing money laundering cases using Cryptocurrency. The perpetrators of the crime are trying to find a place to launder money or a place that cannot trace the assets resulting from the crime. Cryptocurrency is a form of asset that is difficult to trace because it has anonymous and decentralized properties. The method of writing this journal uses normative juridical. The results of the study are that handling TPPU using Cryptocurrency in Indonesia requires the role of PPATK, OJK, KPK, BAPPEBTI, Polri, Prosecutor's Office, Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Interpol, and Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs). The crucial role that must be carried out is coordination for tracing crypto assets, knowing the motives for the flow of funds, analyzing transaction patterns, obtaining evidence, and knowing the parties involved. However, the defendant is the one who is asked to prove assets that are not the result of a crime, because in TPPU the evidentiary system uses reverse proof.
TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP IMPLEMENTASI EMPLOYEE BRANDING DALAM STRATEGI PEMASARAN PERUSAHAAN DI INDONESIA Susanto, Asmara Nova; Ambarwati, Mega Dewi
COURT REVIEW Vol 5 No 03 (2025): ILMU HUKUM
Publisher : COMMUNITY OF RESEARCH LABORATORY (KELOMPOK KOMUNITAS LABORATORIUM PENELITIAN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69957/cr.v5i03.1815

Abstract

Penulisan jurnal ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perspektif hukum terhadap implementasi employee branding dalam strategi pemasaran perusahaan di Indonesia. Employee branding bertujuan membangun citra perusahaan melalui peran aktif karyawan, namun belum diatur secara spesifik dalam regulasi yang ada. Kebijakan branding yang tidak seimbang dapat menimbulkan konflik, seperti pelanggaran privasi, kebebasan berekspresi, dan hak atas perlakuan adil. Metode penulisan jurnal ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa belum terdapat regulasi khusus yang mengatur strategi ini, sehingga perusahaan mengandalkan kebijakan internal, kontrak kerja, dan Perjanjian Kerja Bersama (PKB) untuk menetapkan kewajiban branding. Namun, kebijakan branding yang tidak proporsional dapat menimbulkan konflik, seperti pelanggaran terhadap hak privasi, kebebasan berekspresi, dan perlakuan adil.
Peran Lembaga yang Mendukung Penelusuran Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang yang Menggunakan Cryptocurrency Susanto, Asmara Nova; Afifah, Wiwik
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 2, No 4 (2024): December
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14184847

Abstract

The purpose of writing the journal is to analyze the role of law enforcement agencies in tracing money laundering cases using Cryptocurrency. The perpetrators of the crime are trying to find a place to launder money or a place that cannot trace the assets resulting from the crime. Cryptocurrency is a form of asset that is difficult to trace because it has anonymous and decentralized properties. The method of writing this journal uses normative juridical. The results of the study are that handling TPPU using Cryptocurrency in Indonesia requires the role of PPATK, OJK, KPK, BAPPEBTI, Polri, Prosecutor's Office, Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Interpol, and Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs). The crucial role that must be carried out is coordination for tracing crypto assets, knowing the motives for the flow of funds, analyzing transaction patterns, obtaining evidence, and knowing the parties involved. However, the defendant is the one who is asked to prove assets that are not the result of a crime, because in TPPU the evidentiary system uses reverse proof.