p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.006
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IIJSE
Dhiauddin Tanjung
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Analyzing Subulussalam Community's Views on Electoral Money Politics in 2024: Implications for Leadership and Its Benefits Syafrowi Syafrowi; Dhiauddin Tanjung; Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 7 No 1 (2024): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v7i1.5549

Abstract

This study aims to explore the perception of the citizens of Subulussalam towards the phenomenon of political bribe in the 2024 legislative election (PEMILU) and analyze its impact on the leadership and benefits of the community in Subulussalam City. The political bribe that occurs is often considered commonplace and culturalizes people's habits that are aware or do not damage democracy through the quality of community representation through the legislature. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method, involving in-depth interviews with various key informants, including voters, politicians, and academics in Subulussalam. The results of the study show that there are various election violations, especially violations in terms of political bribery to get votes. When viewed from the perspective of Islamic law, money politics is seen as an illegal act because it violates the principles of justice and trust as stated in Maqashid Sharia. Meanwhile, from a formal legal perspective, this practice is considered a criminal act that must be eradicated to maintain the integrity and credibility of the election process. In terms of social impact, money politics in Subulussalam City in the election of legislative members has had an impact on the level of public trust in the political system and government which is greeted by rampant collusion and nepotism in the election. This study concludes that to realize quality leadership and benefit the people of Subulussalam, there need to be serious efforts from various parties to eradicate money politics by establishing an election system that is not tied to the party. Candidates are also expected to provide transparent information regarding campaign funding, funding sources, and financial coverage. This is useful for limiting the practice of unnatural distribution of money and capital among candidates and parties. Political education, strict law enforcement, and increasing public awareness of the importance of voting based on the competence and integrity of prospective leaders are also needed to achieve these goals.
Legal Analysis of Qurban Meat Distribution to Non-Muslim Citizens from a Maslahah Perspective Gumri Panawari Lubis; Hasan Matsum; Dhiauddin Tanjung
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v8i1.6005

Abstract

This article aims to explain the legal analysis of the distribution of sacrificial meat to non-Muslims from a maslahah perspective. In this article there are two problems that the author will resolve, namely: first, what is the opinion of the ulama regarding the law of distributing sacrificial meat to non-Muslims. Second, how to analyze the law of distributing sacrificial meat to non-Muslims from a Maslahah perspective. This research uses a qualitative method, which is carried out by collecting, analyzing and comprehensively interpreting narratives on visual data to obtain complete, thorough and holistic insight into the legal analysis of the distribution of sacrificial meat to non-Muslims from a maslahah perspective. The results of this research show that: first, the law on the distribution of sacrificial meat to non-Muslims among the ulama has very different opinions, if seen from the opinion of the majority of ulama, they say that it is permissible (makruh) to give food from sacrificial meat to non-Muslims in general. Furthermore, a minority of ulama are of the opinion that it is not permissible to give anything from sacrificial meat to non-Muslims at all.
Marriage Between the Same Clan in Pakpak Simsim Traditions Perspective of Mashlahah Mursalah Bukti Padang; Dhiauddin Tanjung; Nispul Khair
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v8i2.6499

Abstract

This study aims to describe the prohibition of marriage between clans in the Pakpak Simsim custom in the Pakpak Bharat Regency from the Mashlahah Mursaya perspective, including the causes, impacts, and influences. This study aims to: Find out how marriage between clans is in the Pakpak Simsim custom, Find out what the sanctions are for those who carry out marriage between clans in the Pakpak Simsim custom, Find out how the law of marriage between clans is in the Pakpak Simsim custom from the Mashlahah Mursalah perspective. This type of research is empirical juridical, with data collection techniques including document studies, interviews, and observations. Furthermore, the data is processed and analyzed descriptively using several theories as analytical tools such as Mashlahah Mursalah (Public Interest) and legal awareness. with the method, The results of the study provide two answers, namely: first, in the Pak-Pak community, it is very forbidden to have marriages between clans that have been in effect for generations from the ancestors, the prohibition of marriage between clans is because the Pakpak Tribe considers that one clan is a sibling who cannot be married because they are of the same sex or from the same womb. Second, according to some information, the sanctions for those who married within the same clan in the Pakpak tribe were more towards social sanctions such as being considered uncultured and against customs, not being recognized as citizens, being expelled and ostracized from the village, not being recognized as family, not adding siblings in terms of socializing, even in the past, those who married within the same clan were more cruel and sadistic, namely the couple would be killed. Third, even though in the Qur'an or hadith there is no prohibition on marriage within the same clan, there is no prohibition related to marriage within the same clan, but if viewed from the perspective of Mashlahah Mursalah there is one side of consideration that is good for maintaining the custom of prohibiting marriage within the same clan, namely maintaining kinship.
Division of Inherited Wealth in Customary Marriages in Gayo Lues Regency: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Compilation of Islamic Law Ramadhan Ariga; Dhiauddin Tanjung; Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v8i2.6528

Abstract

This study investigates the division of inherited wealth in customary marriages within the Gayo Lues Regency, focusing on the interplay between local cultural practices and the principles outlined in the Compilation of Islamic Law. Inheritance is a critical aspect of social and economic stability, and understanding how it is managed in this unique context is essential for promoting equity and justice. The research delves into the specific customs that govern inheritance distribution among the Gayo Lues community, examining how these practices align or conflict with Islamic legal frameworks. Through qualitative analysis, including interviews and case studies, the study reveals the complexities families face in navigating customary and religious obligations. Key findings indicate that while customary practices are deeply rooted in the community's identity, there is a growing need for harmonization with Islamic law to ensure fair and just distribution of wealth. The study also highlights the role of community leaders and religious authorities in mediating disputes and educating the public about their rights under both customary and Islamic law. Ultimately, this research aims to provide valuable insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and community leaders, emphasizing the importance of integrating cultural sensitivity with legal frameworks to enhance the understanding and implementation of inheritance rights. The study seeks to contribute to social justice and economic empowerment in the Gayo Lues Regency by fostering dialogue and collaboration between customary and Islamic legal systems.
Management of Zakat Muqayyad to Students Reviewed from Jasser Auda's Theory of Maqasid Syariah Rizky Fadhilah; Dhiauddin Tanjung; Hasan Matsum
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v8i2.6580

Abstract

This study aims to explain the management of muqayyad zakat carried out by the Rumah Zakat institution in Medan. This research is a juridical-empirical or field research. The data sources for this study consist of primary and secondary data, which were collected through observational studies, interviews, and documentation. Once accumulated, the data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive analysis method. This study aims to explore the management of muqayyad zakat carried out by the Rumah Zakat institution in Medan, examine the system for determining the amount of muqayyad zakat, and understand how the distribution of muqayyad zakat is governed by Islamic law based on the Maqasid Syariah framework by Jasser Auda. After conducting the research, the researcher found several results as follows: The management of muqayyad zakat at Rumah Zakat Medan, in terms of zakat collection, is specifically carried out by amil who serve as fundraisers, receiving contributions from partners and donors. In the distribution process, zakat funds are directly transferred to the parents of students and used as educational funds for the children. Utilizing muqayyad zakat is carried out by organizing educational activities such as Quran learning, surah memorization, and prayer practice. The muqayyad zakat fund for students in Medan does not have a fixed nominal amount, as the amount is determined based on the capability of the partner who provides the muqayyad zakat. The distribution of muqayyad zakat to students is in line with the objectives of Islamic law, as viewed from Jasser Auda's Maqasid Syariah theory, which includes the preservation of intellect ('aql), wealth (mal), and religion (din).
Economic Implications of Wives' Fulfillment of Family Support: A Review from the Perspectives of Syafi'i and Hambali Mhd. Mahya Nasuha; Dhiauddin Tanjung; Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31538/iijse.v8i2.7623

Abstract

This study examines the economic implications of wives’ fulfillment of family support, analyzed through the perspectives of the Syafi'i and Hambali Islamic legal schools. The purpose is to understand how these jurisprudential views influence family economic dynamics and the role of wives in sustaining family welfare. The study employs a qualitative literature review methodology, analyzing classical and contemporary fiqh texts and scholarly interpretations related to women’s financial contributions within the household. The findings indicate that both the Syafi'i and Hambali schools provide nuanced frameworks recognizing wives’ involvement in family economic matters while emphasizing responsibilities aligned with social and religious norms. This review highlights the importance of integrating religious jurisprudence with socio-economic realities to foster family sustainability.