Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Priviet Social Sciences Journal Legalis : Journal of Law Review Solusi Bersama : Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat
Fedhli Faisal
Universitas Pamulang
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
The comparison of narcotics criminalization in Indonesia and The Netherlands Fedhli Faisal; Ali Imron
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i12.1063

Abstract

This article discusses the comparative punishment for drug crimes in Indonesia and the Netherlands, two countries with very different legal approaches to dealing with drug-related cases. This article's primary goal is to examine the variations in the two nations' criminal policy strategies, the types of sanctions, and the legal foundations. This study uses a comparative legal method by examining the laws, doctrines, and criminal policies in force in each country. The results show that Indonesia tends to use a repressive approach with the threat of severe criminal penalties, including the death penalty and life imprisonment, whereas the Netherlands adopts a limited decriminalization approach for certain substances, focusing on rehabilitation and harm reduction. These findings reflect the differences in criminal law philosophy between punitive and more progressive legal systems. This article recommends a re-evaluation of the effectiveness of punishment in Indonesia, taking into account a more humane and public health-based approach, such as that applied in the Netherlands
Pathways to Youth Radicalization: A Criminological Analysis of Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies Fedhli Faisal; Amin Songgirin
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i2.1940

Abstract

The growing involvement of youth in violent extremism and radical movements has emerged as a pressing global concern, raising urgent questions about the underlying social and criminogenic factors that drive this phenomenon. This study aims to explore the pathways of youth radicalization through a criminological lens, identifying the key risk factors and proposing context sensitive prevention strategies. Using a normative juridical and descriptive analytical approach, the research examines relevant legal frameworks, criminological theories, and secondary data sources to develop a comprehensive model of youth radicalization. The findings reveal that radicalization is not a linear or homogenous process, but rather the result of intersecting influences such as social marginalization, institutional neglect, identity crises, and exposure to extremist narrative soften reinforced by digital environments. The analysis supports and expands upon strain theory and social disorganization theory, emphasizing the role of structural exclusion and weakened community ties. This study also identifies limitations in dominant counter radicalization strategies that rely heavily on surveillance and psychological profiling, arguing instead for holistic, rights based, and community driven interventions. The research contributes to the theoretical discourse on radicalization while offering actionable recommendations for policymakers, educators, and civil society actors. Its implications underscore the need for preventive frameworks that are ethically grounded, socially inclusive, and empirically informed. By shifting the paradigm from securitization to social resilience, this study advocates for a more just and sustainable approach to addressing youth radicalization.
Application for Bankruptcy Declaration or Suspension of Debt Payment Obligation for Developers Viewed from the Principles of Balance and Justice Fedhli Faisal
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4857

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the implications of bankruptcy petition or postponement of debt payment obligations on developers in Indonesia, considering legal principles, particularly the principles of balance and justice within the framework of the Bankruptcy and Debt Payment Obligation Postponement Act (UU Kepailitan & PKPU). The background of this study encompasses the importance of legal certainty for consumers and developers in the context of fair and efficient financial settlements.  The research methodology employs a legal document analysis approach, involving literature review and case interpretation to evaluate the application of the Bankruptcy and PKPU Act on developers, and to analyze the impact of Supreme Court Regulation No. 03/2023 on court interpretations in relevant cases. The findings indicate that the Bankruptcy and PKPU Act provides a crucial legal framework to protect the interests of consumers and developers, but its application must carefully consider legal principles, particularly in proving facts or circumstances influencing decisions on bankruptcy or PKPU petitions. The implications of these findings underscore the need for courts to maintain a balance between creditors' rights and protection for debtors experiencing financial difficulties. Proposed recommendations include the necessity for clarity in legal interpretations, consistent implementation of the Bankruptcy and PKPU Act, and an approach favoring justice in every bankruptcy or PKPU petition decision.
Application of the Lex Mitior Principle in Narcotics Cases: Supreme Court Decision No. 499 PK/Pid.Sus/2026 Fedhli Faisal; Surya Oktarina; Yesi Lestarina Sutoyo
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): July 2026
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v4i3.1781

Abstract

This study employs a normative doctrinal case analysis to examine the application of the lex mitior principle in Supreme Court Decision Number 499 PK/Pid.Sus/2026 and its relationship with the continuing application of the special Narcotics Law. The study focuses on how the Supreme Court applied the more favorable post-enactment sentencing framework without eliminating the established criminal liability under the Narcotics Law. Decisions Number 1565 PK/Pid.Sus/2026 and Number 1717 PK/Pid.Sus/2026 are used as purposively selected supporting decisions to provide a limited comparative perspective. The analysis demonstrates that lex mitior operated primarily through sentencing adjustment rather than through reclassification of the established offense. In Decision Number 499 PK/Pid.Sus/2026, the Supreme Court reduced the sentence from nine years of imprisonment and an IDR 800,000,000 fine imposed by the District Court to six years of imprisonment without a fine at the judicial review stage. The Court maintained the finding concerning unlawful possession of Category I narcotics under Article 112 of Law Number 35 of 2009 and separately maintained the pharmaceutical offense concerning Trihexyphenidyl HCl-containing tablets. The comparison with Decisions Number 1565 PK/Pid.Sus/2026 and Number 1717 PK/Pid.Sus/2026 indicates a preliminary pattern of applying a more favorable sentencing framework, although the cases differ in offense classification, quantity of narcotics, factual circumstances, and sentencing considerations.
Kriminologis Terhadap Kejahatan Judi Online Pada Remaja Fedhli Faisal; ST. Mahmud Syaukat; Muhammad Rehan; Ahmad Firdaus; Muhammad Fachri; Osama; Salsah Nadhiyah Farellia Nabila
Solusi Bersama : Jurnal Pengabdian dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Agustus : Solusi Bersama : Jurnal Pengabdian dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/solusibersama.v3i3.3556

Abstract

Judi online berkembang menjadi persoalan risiko digital yang serius bagi remaja karena menggabungkan kemudahan akses, promosi digital yang agresif, pengaruh teman sebaya, serta transaksi pembayaran yang cepat. Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat ini bertujuan memperkuat literasi hukum dan kesadaran kriminologis mengenai bahaya judi online bagi siswa MAS Al-Irsyadiyah Ciseeng Bogor. Kegiatan menggunakan pendekatan edukatif dan partisipatif melalui identifikasi kebutuhan, penyuluhan hukum, ceramah interaktif, diskusi berbasis kasus, dan tanya jawab. Materi mencakup kedudukan hukum judi online, faktor risiko kriminologis, dampak sosial dan psikologis, risiko keuangan digital, serta strategi pencegahan yang melibatkan siswa, keluarga, dan sekolah. Lembar hadir yang tersedia mencatat 20 peserta. Hasil kegiatan yang dievaluasi secara deskriptif melalui respons peserta dan dinamika diskusi menunjukkan penguatan pemahaman mengenai bentuk perilaku terkait perjudian, pengaruh tekanan teman sebaya dan lemahnya kontrol sosial, risiko penyalahgunaan sarana pembayaran digital, serta pentingnya pencegahan sejak dini. Peserta juga diarahkan pada langkah protektif berupa menolak ajakan berjudi, menggunakan pembayaran digital secara bertanggung jawab, mengomunikasikan paparan konten berisiko kepada orang tua atau guru, serta melaporkan konten perjudian ilegal. Karena laporan sumber tidak menyertakan instrumen dan tabulasi skor pre-test/post-test, artikel ini tidak mengklaim peningkatan yang signifikan secara statistik. Edukasi hukum berbasis kasus di sekolah dapat menjadi strategi preventif untuk memperkuat ketahanan remaja terhadap judi online.
Co-Authors Ahmad Firdaus Ali Imron Amin Songgirin Muhammad Fachri Muhammad Rehan Osama Salsah Nadhiyah Farellia Nabila ST. Mahmud Syaukat Surya Oktarina Yesi Lestarina Sutoyo