Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.066
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Darma Agung Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Lex Journal : Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan PESHUM
Febrian Rizki Pratama
University Of Narotama
Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Human Cloning from the Perspectives of Natural Law, Legal Positivism, and Utilitarianism Putra, Eduard Awang Maha; Pratama, Febrian Rizki; Mohamed, Muhammad Azimuddin
Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan Vol 8 No 1 (2024): July
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Dr. Soetomo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25139/lex.v8i1.8774

Abstract

Today cloning has become “the hottest topic” in biotechnology and biomedical studies. The earliest opening questions about human cloning are: Will human cloning become normative on this planet? This seems to be a very simple question, but it is not enough to answer yes or no, it requires deep thinking. The purpose of this research is to analyze the issue of human cloning from the perspective of natural law, legal positivism, and utilitarianism. This research uses an interdisciplinary approach to explore different perspectives in answering the issue at hand. The results show that from the perspective of natural law, human cloning shows that humans have transcended their nature as creatures created by God and instead want to step over God as the creator of all life. While in the perspective of legal positivism, if cloning is done without going through a legal marriage process and can use eggs and any cells other than sperm from the husband and wife concerned, it is very clear that cloning of humans is contrary to or violates positive law in Indonesia (Health Law and Government Regulation on Reproductive Health). Then in the perspective of utilitarianism, the goal of Utilitarian theory can indeed be achieved because cloning can in fact avoid humans from distress or suffering, but this is only for some individuals because cloning does not provide benefits or happiness in a broad scope or in this case society as a whole, especially the lower middle class.
KEDUDUKAN AKTA PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI BERDASARKAN UTANG PIUTANG DITINJAU DARI ASAS PROPORSIONALITAS Farida, Nur; Pratama, Febrian Rizki
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v4i3.452

Abstract

Nowadays, there are still many cases in the community about the practice of buying and selling land based on debt and credit, which causes unbalanced fulfillment of the rights and obligations of the parties who make it, and causes losses to one party, especially the party who transfers his land rights. Not infrequently there are also many Notary officials who are involved in the making of a sale and purchase binding agreement based on debt and credit, as in the example of a case decided by the Surabaya District Court with case number 198/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sby. The purpose of this study is to determine the position of the deed of sale and purchase binding agreement based on debt and credit in terms of the principle of proportionality and to determine the role of notaries in protecting the interests of the rights and obligations of the parties to the agreement. The research method is normative juridical method using statute approach, and case approach. From the research it can be concluded that the position of the deed of sale and purchase binding agreement based on debt and credit is proven to violate the legal principle of proportionality and Notary as a public official has an important role in ensuring protection for the rights and obligations that may arise from agreements made by the parties involved.
THRESHOLD: DILEMATIS PRESIDEN ANATARA MENERAPKAN PROGRAM KERJA SENDIRI ATAU BERKOMPROSI DENGAN PARTAI PEMILIK KURSI DI DPR DENGAN PERBANDINGAN KETETAPAN PEMILU DI BRAZIL Salsabila, Zuraida; Pratama, Febrian Rizki; Imam, Asrul
JURNAL DARMA AGUNG Vol 31 No 4 (2023): AGUSTUS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Universitas Darma Agung (LPPM_UDA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46930/ojsuda.v31i4.3554

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan perbandingan persyaratan mengenai bakal calon Presiden dan Calon Wakil Presiden sudah tercantum didalam pasal 6a Ayat 2 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 yang masih sering menimbulkan pro dan kontra terkait aturan ini karena dinilai mengurangi hak seseorang untuk mencalonkan diri sebagai Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, sehingga diperlukan pembaharuan hukum. Peneltian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Dalam hasil yang diteliti menyatakan bahwa Apabila kita menggunakan metode yang sama dengan negara brazil yaitu dengan memperoleh kemenangan sebesar 50% + 1 suara menjadi syarat kemenangan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, maka hal ini memicu terjadinya gelombang 2 pemilihan suara dan pasti akan menambah biaya pemilu yang sangat besar sekali. Jika dikontekstualkan dengan pengaturan di Indonesia saat ini, maka pasal 6A ayat (3) telah mengatur bahwasanya untuk dilantik menjadi seorang Presiden, seorang kandidat harus mendapatkan suara sebesar 50 persen dari jumlah suara dalam pemilu dengan sedikitnya 20 persen suara di setiap provinsi yang tersebar di lebih dari setengah jumlah provinsi di Indonesia.
Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Paten Domestik Terhadap Pemegang Hak Paten Asing Yang Sejenis Aissha Amanda As Zahra; Rusdianto Sesung; Febrian Rizki Pratama
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2: Februari 2025
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v4i2.8261

Abstract

Pentingnya perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI) dalam mempertahankan kekayaan intelektual suatu negara dan mendorong investasi asing. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2016 di Indonesia mempengaruhi pengakuan internasional terhadap paten yang terdaftar, serta tantangan yang dihadapi pemegang hak paten domestik dalam memahami perlindungan hak mereka di negara lain. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk menganalisis perlindungan bagi pemegang hak paten yang memiliki hak paten serupa di luar negeri dengan menyelaraskan ketentuan TRIPs untuk meningkatkan perlindungan hak paten domestik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterlibatan Indonesia dalam perjanjian internasional seperti PCT memberikan dampak signifikan dalam memperluas perlindungan hak paten di pasar internasional, serta efisiensi proses pendaftaran yang menghemat waktu dan biaya bagi pemohon. Selain itu, meskipun Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2016 telah mencakup aspek penting seperti durasi perlindungan selama 20 tahun, masih diperlukan perhatian lebih terhadap implementasi ketentuan TRIPs. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya kerjasama antara pemerintah, sektor swasta, dan masyarakat untuk memperkuat kapasitas penegakan hukum agar sesuai dengan standar internasional yang ditetapkan oleh TRIPs.
Default of the Construction Service Provider as a Reason for Termination of the Construction Work Contract Febrian Rizki Pratama; Maulana Farhan Abdillah; Mohammad Nuralify; Astri Damayanti; Febriyanti Putri AR
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 3 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5165

Abstract

Termination of a construction contract can be carried out if it arises as a result of failure to fulfill the obligations of one of the parties, in this case a wanprestatie occurs. Therefore, what form of wanprestatie is committed by the service provider is the reason for terminating the contract and what legal remedies can be taken to terminate the construction contract due to wanprestatie. The aim of this research is to analyze the form of wanprestatie by service provider as a reason for terminating the contract and analyzing the legal remedies taken by the construction service provider to terminate the contract due to wanprestatie. This research uses normative legal research using statute approaches, conceptual approaches, and case approaches. The first result is that the form of contract termination is in the form of a fundamental error with a benchmark, namely a form of wanprestatie committed by the service provider as a reason for terminating the contract by the service user, namely in the form of a fundamental error, such as work delays with a benchmark, namely the service provider has not been able to fulfill the work progress specified. It is agreed by the service user or service provider that they have not carried out their work after one month of signing the contract so that the service user gives a warning letter to the service provider to be given time to correct their negligence within the specified time period, which is done by giving a warning letter 3 (three) times. The second result is that service providers can take legal remedies against unilateral contract termination if they go through non-litigation, then they can take deliberation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration. Not only that, settlement can also be done through a dispute council. If using litigation, the service provider can make file a lawsuit in the District Court.
Co-Authors Aissha Amanda As Zahra Astri Damayanti Eduard Awang Maha Putra Febriyanti Putri AR Imam, Asrul Maulana Farhan Abdillah Mohamed, Muhammad Azimuddin Mohammad Nuralify Nur Farida Rusdianto Sesung Salsabila, Zuraida Stefani Margareta