Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.01
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Inicio Legis : Jurnal Hukum
I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Visas as Preventive Legal Protection for the Sovereignty of the State of Indonesia: The Perspective of the Selective Policy Principle in Indonesian Immigration Law Ni Putu Pera Krisna Dewi; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7096

Abstract

A visa is understood as a specific permit to reside for foreign nationals. In Indonesia, Law No. 6/2011 on Immigration affirms the applicability of the Selective Policy principle to ensure that not everyone can easily stay in Indonesia, particularly with certain requirements to ensure national security and sovereignty. This research aims to analyze visas as an instrument of preventive legal protection for Indonesia's national sovereignty in relation to the implementation of the Selective Policy principle. This research is normative legal research with a conceptual and legislative approach. The research findings confirm that visas are a preventive legal protection effort for the sovereignty of the Indonesian state because they allow for the identification of the background of individuals seeking residency permits in Indonesia. As a preventive legal protection effort for state sovereignty, visas are relevant to the principle of Selective Policy in Indonesian immigration law, which emphasizes state sovereignty and security as the most important aspects, making the restriction of residency permits thru visas relevant.
The Rights of Families of Terminal Patients to Refuse Futile Treatment: Legal and Ethical Limitations Primanto Tantiono; I Made Wirya Darma; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7104

Abstract

Patients in terminal conditions are frequently subjected to futile medical interventions, namely treatments that no longer provide therapeutic benefits and merely prolong the biological process of life without improving its quality. This situation creates a dilemma between the family’s right to refuse such interventions and the physician’s professional obligations bound by ethical oaths and legal frameworks. In Indonesia, the regulation regarding the refusal of futile treatment by families of terminal patients remains ambiguous, leading to legal uncertainty and potential conflicts in healthcare practice. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal boundaries governing the authority of families of terminal patients to refuse futile medical treatment and to examine medical ethical principles as the basis for legitimizing such rights. This research adopts a normative legal method with a conceptual approach, focusing on the study of legislation, legal doctrines, academic literature, and professional codes of ethics. The findings reveal that the legal foundation for the family’s authority to refuse futile treatment can be traced through the principle of informed consent as stipulated in the Medical Practice Act and the rights of patients in the Health Act. However, the absence of explicit regulation creates a wide scope for interpretation, which may trigger disputes. From an ethical standpoint, the family’s right to refuse futile interventions gains legitimacy through the principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. The originality of this research lies in its integration of normative legal analysis with medical ethics principles, emphasizing the urgency of establishing specific regulations to ensure legal certainty while safeguarding patient dignity
Legal Philosophy in Construction Contract Dispute Resolution: Between Arbitration and Litigation I Wayan Lastikayasa; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7122

Abstract

Disputes in construction contracts are a common occurrence due to project complexity, differing interpretations of clauses, and delays in work execution. In practice, two main dispute resolution paths are often chosen: arbitration and litigation. This study stems from the need to examine these dispute resolution mechanisms not only from a procedural perspective but also from a legal philosophy perspective that emphasizes the values ​​of justice, legal certainty, and expediency. The purpose of this study is to understand how legal philosophy can serve as a basis for selecting and assessing the effectiveness of arbitration and litigation as forums for resolving construction contract disputes. This study uses a juridical-normative method with a qualitative approach, supported by a comparative analysis of regulations, arbitration and court decisions, and relevant legal philosophy literature. The analysis shows that arbitration emphasizes efficiency, confidentiality, and procedural flexibility, thus closer to the values ​​of expediency and legal certainty. Conversely, litigation offers formal legitimacy, transparency, and broader legal protection, reflecting the values ​​of formal justice. However, both have limitations: arbitration is often hampered by high costs, while litigation is often protracted. The selection of a dispute resolution mechanism in a construction contract should be based not only on practical aspects but also on philosophical considerations regarding the objectives of the law. Thus, the integration of justice, certainty, and expediency can serve as a primary guideline in determining the most appropriate dispute resolution forum
Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata: Tinjauan Teori Hukum Responsif Nonet dan Selznick I Putu Windu Semara Putra; I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7123

Abstract

Civil procedural law is the primary instrument for resolving civil disputes in court. However, in practice, criticism often arises that existing procedures tend to be rigid, formalistic, and do not always meet the needs of justice seekers. The responsive legal theory developed by Nonet and Selznick offers an analytical framework for assessing the extent to which the legal system is able to adapt to the aspirations and interests of society. This study aims to examine how civil procedural law in Indonesia functions in resolving civil disputes and to assess the extent to which its application can be categorized as responsive law, according to Nonet and Selznick's theory. This study uses a normative-juridical approach with a literature review. Data were obtained from relevant laws and regulations, legal literature, and court decisions, then analyzed qualitatively through the perspective of responsive legal theory. The analysis shows that although civil procedural law has provided a formal mechanism for resolving disputes, its implementation is often procedural and slow. This creates a gap between legal norms and the reality of justice seekers. Within the theoretical framework of Nonet and Selznick, Indonesian civil procedural law tends to be at the stage of "autonomous law," which emphasizes formal rules, but has not yet fully reached the stage of "responsive law," which is oriented towards substantive justice and social needs. Civil procedural law needs to be directed in a more responsive direction by simplifying procedures, improving access to justice, and emphasizing fair resolution for the parties. Thus, law becomes not only a procedural tool, but also an instrument of justice that lives within society.
KAJIAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL TERHADAP KEKELIRUAN DALAM MENETAPKAN MEREK DENGAN PERSAMAAN ESENSIAL Virgina Ayu Aisyah; I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Komang Satria Wibawa Putra; Bagus Gede Ari Rama
Inicio Legis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trunojoyo Madura Vol 6, No 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/il.v6i2.31605

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas kewenangan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual (DJKI) dalam mencegah pendaftaran merek yang memiliki persamaan pada pokoknya serta bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum atas kelalaian yang mungkin timbul dalam proses pemeriksaannya. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, DJKI memiliki kewenangan atributif yang bersifat imperatif untuk menolak pendaftaran merek yang berpotensi menimbulkan kebingungan konsumen, merugikan pemilik hak yang sudah ada, atau mendorong praktik persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Dalam kerangka hukum administrasi, kewenangan ini dipandang sebagai instrumen penting untuk menjaga kepastian hukum sekaligus perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual. Namun, ketika DJKI lalai menjalankan kewenangan tersebut, konsekuensi hukum yang timbul tidak hanya bersifat administratif, tetapi juga dapat berimplikasi pada tanggung jawab perdata bahkan melalui mekanisme gugatan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Hal ini sejalan dengan teori pertanggungjawaban hukum yang menempatkan organ negara sebagai pihak yang dapat dimintakan tanggung jawab apabila tindakan lalai atau keliru menimbulkan kerugian bagi masyarakat. Di sisi lain, kelalaian tersebut juga berdampak pada dimensi sosial, berupa potensi kerugian ekonomi, turunnya kepercayaan publik, serta berkurangnya legitimasi sistem hukum kekayaan intelektual. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya penguatan mekanisme pemeriksaan merek melalui peningkatan kapasitas sumber daya manusia, penggunaan teknologi pendukung, serta pembentukan regulasi turunan yang lebih rinci mengenai tanggung jawab administrasi. Dengan langkah-langkah tersebut, diharapkan sistem pendaftaran merek di Indonesia dapat berjalan secara transparan, akuntabel, dan mampu memberikan perlindungan hukum yang optimal.Kata Kunci: BUMN, Efisiensi BUMN, Rasionalitas Ekonomi. DJKI, kewenangan hukum, pertanggungjawaban hukum, merek, kekayaan intelektual
Co-Authors A.A.A Ngr. Tini Rusmini Gorda Axl Mattew Situmorang Bagus Gede Ari Rama I Gede Yudi Mahendra I Made Suwandana Putra I Made Wirya Darma I Putu Windu Semara Putra I Wayan Lastikayasa Kadek Januarsa Adi Sudharma Kadek Putri Nirmala Dewi Komang Satria Wibawa Putra Mochammad Lukman Hakim Ni Komang Sri Oka Mariana Dewi Ni Nyoman Ayu Risna Maryuni Ni Nyoman Mitha Sakarani Ni Putu Pera Krisna Dewi Primanto Tantiono Putu Andika Wahyudi Putra Putu Febby Regina Pingkan Virgina Ayu Aisyah