Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Rachman, Rheyna Reva
Unknown Affiliation
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Wanprestasi Perjanjian Kerja dalam Aspek Hukum Keperdataan Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Jakarta Selatan Nomor: 272/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Sel Darmawan, Cinta Rizqareka; Rachman, Rheyna Reva; Rafiki , Najla; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): March
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perjanjian kontrak kerja, yang mengatur hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak, merupakan hubungan hukum penting antara pekerja dan pengusaha. Namun, ada halnya ketika perjanjian tersebut dapat gagal yang menyebabkan salah satu pihak mengalami kerugian. Untuk menghindari kegagalan dan menjaga hubungan kerja yang sehat dalam situasi seperti ini, penting untuk menyelesaikan perselisihan. Ada dua cara penyelesaian sengketa, yaitu non-litigasi (seperti negosiasi dan mediasi) dan litigasi atau melalui jalur hukum (seperti pengadilan). Sangat penting untuk memahami upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh oleh pihak yang dirugikan dalam penyelesaian sengketa wanprestasi perjanjian kerja. Para pihak dapat membangun hubungan profesional yang kuat, saling menguntungkan, dan berkelanjutan melalui tindakan pencegahan yang tepat, seperti membuat perjanjian yang jelas, berkomunikasi secara terbuka, mengawasi kinerja, dan bekerja sama untuk menyelesaikan sengketa. Dengan demikian, penulis melakukan analisis terhadap kasus wanprestasi perjanjian kerja dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif agar dapat memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam tentang penerapan hukum perdata dan implikasi hukumnya.
Analisis Etika Profesi Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Dampak Pelanggaran Kode Etik dalam Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Amanda, Niken Dwi; Azzahra, Fidda Nazli; Nurdin, Merry Kurniawati; Dharmawan, Cinta Rizqareka; Rahmadani, Novia; Rachman, Rheyna Reva; Az Zahra, Hilyah; Ardyanti, Widyarini; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) plays a crucial role in safeguarding the constitution and upholding the principles of constitutional democracy in Indonesia. However, its credibility and integrity have been seriously questioned following the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which addresses the minimum age requirement for presidential and vice-presidential candidates. This ruling sparked widespread controversy due to its perceived political interests and alleged violations of judicial ethics by several justices, particularly Chief Justice Anwar Usman, who was found by the Constitutional Court’s Honorary Council (MKMK) to have breached impartiality due to a family conflict of interest involving one of the candidates favored by the decision. This study employs a normative legal research method using both statutory and conceptual approaches to critically analyze the role of judicial ethics in maintaining the independence of the Constitutional Court, and to evaluate the legal and sociological implications of ethical violations on the legitimacy and validity of the Court's decision. The analysis shows that while the ruling remains legally valid and binding in accordance with Article 24C of the 1945 Constitution and the Constitutional Court Law (UU MK), which affirms the final and binding nature of Constitutional Court decisions, its moral and social legitimacy is significantly undermined due to unethical practices that contradict the principles of integrity, transparency, and accountability. Ethical violations in the decision-making process not only tarnish the personal reputation of the justices involved but also erode public trust in the institutional independence of the Constitutional Court. In modern constitutional legal systems, procedural legality cannot be separated from constitutional morality. The continued function of the Constitutional Court as the protector of citizens' constitutional rights and the guardian of constitutional supremacy is heavily dependent on the legitimacy derived from public trust. Therefore, reforming the judicial ethics system and strengthening the role of the MK as an independent and effective ethical oversight body is an urgent necessity to ensure that the Constitutional Court remains a dignified and authoritative institution in Indonesia's constitutional democrac
Co-Authors Amanda, Niken Dwi Ardyanti, Widyarini Az Zahra, Hilyah Azzahra, Fidda Nazli Darmawan, Cinta Rizqareka Dharmawan, Cinta Rizqareka Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Mulyadi M, Mulyadi Nurdin, Merry Kurniawati Rafiki , Najla Rahmadani, Novia