Novi Fitia Maliha
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Authority of the Fatwa of the Majelis Tarjih and Tajdid on Fajr Time in Ponorogo East Java: Between Scholarly Authority and Organizational Compliance Abdullah, Fuady; Novi Fitia Maliha; Sari, Ima Frafika
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 58 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : UINSunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v58i1.1399

Abstract

Fatwas are a significant tool in Islamic jurisprudence, regulating human behaviour and shaping society's knowledge and interpretation. In an organization, fatwas have more binding power. However, in responding to it, each faces other societal structures. This research focuses on implementing a tarjih decision (putusan tarjih) by the Tarjih and Tajdid Council (Majelis Tarjih dan Tajdid - MTT) of Muhammadiyah regarding changes in the Fajr time. Using Max Weber's theory of Social Action, this study investigates how the Council's legal-rational authority impacts compliance among followers. The findings show that organisational structure and acceptance of MTT influence Muhammadiyah members' obedience to the fatwa as an authority according to the criteria of Islamic jurisprudence. This study adds to the scholarly understanding of religious authority in contemporary Islamic organizations by focusing on how fatwa-making and its implementation steps affect community behaviour and religious practice. Furthermore, it emphasizes the significance of contextualizing Islamic law in response to local social dynamics, laying the groundwork for future research on the relationship between religious edicts and societal norms in organisational settings. Fatwa memainkan peran penting dalam yurisprudensi Islam dan merupakan alat untuk mengatur perilaku manusia dan membentuk pemahaman dan interpretasi masyarakat. Dalam konteks organisasi, fatwa memiliki kekuatan yang lebih mengikat. Namun, dalam menanggapinya, setiap individu juga dihadapkan pada struktur lain dalam masyarakat. Penelitian ini berfokus pada implementasi putusan tarjih oleh Majelis Tarjih dan Tajdid (MTT) Muhammadiyah terkait perubahan waktu subuh. Dengan menggunakan teori Max Weber tentang tindakan sosial, penelitian ini menyelidiki bagaimana otoritas legal-rasional MTT berdampak pada kepatuhan para pengikutnya. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepatuhan anggota terhadap fatwa dipengaruhi oleh struktur organisasi dan penerimaan terhadap MTT sebagai otoritas menurut kriteria yurisprudensi Islam. Studi ini menambah pemahaman ilmiah tentang otoritas keagamaan dalam organisasi Islam kontemporer dengan berfokus pada bagaimana pembuatan fatwa dan langkah implementasinya mempengaruhi perilaku masyarakat dan praktik keagamaan. Selain itu, studi ini menekankan pentingnya kontekstualisasi hukum Islam sebagai respons terhadap dinamika sosial setempat, yang menjadi dasar bagi penelitian di masa depan tentang hubungan antara fatwa agama dan norma-norma masyarakat dalam konteks organisasi.
Social Construction of Sedarum Village Community on Money Politics in Village Head Elections Amrillah, Radha; Novi Fitia Maliha
Journal of Religion, Local Politics, and Law Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Political Communication in Elections
Publisher : PT Pro Panoramic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64595/jrlpl.275

Abstract

This research aims to understand the social construction of the Sedarum Village community towards money politics in the village head election, how the community interprets and responds to money politics, because this money politics has been considered commonplace by the community, which leads to transactional vote buying. The phenomenon of money politics may be familiar to us, including the people of Sedarum Village. At the time of the village head election, there were two candidates for the position of village head, and both candidates gave money to the community to vote. Because in Sedarum village, it has become a tradition that every time there is an election, there must be money received, even worse, most Sedarum people receive money from the two candidates. Phenomenological theory is used to analyze the meaning of money politics from the community's point of view, and political economy theory that explains the economic motivation behind the acceptance of money politics. The results show that money politics has become a tradition that is difficult to avoid, where most people tend to accept money in exchange for voting, even people who have close connections with candidates can get more money than ordinary people. Money politics not only affects election results, but also changes the social and political structure of the village, where the financial capability of prospective village leaders is more important than the quality of leadership.