Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

EVIDENCE OF PERSUASIVE IN PREDICTIVE MURDER Afriyati, Afriyati; Isnaeni , Belly; Saputra, Agung Arafat
Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 10 (2024): Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora
Publisher : Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The teaching on participation as a basis for expanding the criminal penalties for people involved in the realization of a crime. Participation is regulated in Article 55, Article 56 of the Criminal Code and Article 57 of the Criminal Code which means that there are two or more people who commit a crime. Participation (deelneming) in positive law is that there are two or more people who commit a crime or in other words there are two or more people taking part in realizing a crime, it can be stated that a person participates in a relationship with another person (regulated in Article 55 and 56 of the Criminal Code). In Article 55 paragraph 1 to 2 of the Criminal Code, the Concept of Persuasion can be categorized as those who by giving or promising something by abusing power or dignity, with violence, threats or misleading, or by providing opportunities, means or information, intentionally encourage others to commit acts. The participation of the persuader in the crime of premeditated murder is subject to accountability as regulated in Article 340 of the Criminal Code. Article 55 of the Criminal Code contains four forms of participation:a). those who do; b). ordered to do; c). participate in doing; d). persuade/advocate/move other people to do it.
Analisa Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) berdasarkan UU Ketenagakerjaan No. 13 Tahun 2003 Imanuddin, Iman; Salim, Agus; Isnaeni , Belly
Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 11 (2024): Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora
Publisher : Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

PHK efisiensi tanpa penutupan perusahaan dilakukan dengan mempertimbangkan aspek kemanfaatan, yaitu untuk menghindari peningkatan angka pengangguran. Penutupan perusahaan dapat menyebabkan semua pekerja, termasuk pengusaha, kehilangan pekerjaan. Sebaliknya, PHK efisiensi tanpa menutup perusahaan dapat menyelamatkan kelangsungan operasional perusahaan dan mempertahankan pekerjaan bagi sebagian pekerja lainnya. Alasan efisiensi ini juga tidak dilarang oleh Pasal 153 ayat (1) UU Ketenagakerjaan, serta Konvensi dan Rekomendasi ILO tahun 1982, yang menyatakan bahwa PHK tanpa kesalahan tidak melanggar aturan. Selain itu, lembaga penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial perlu memastikan bahwa PHK efisiensi tanpa penutupan perusahaan dilakukan secara adil, sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip PHK, dan bahwa hak serta kompensasi pekerja dipenuhi dengan tepat.