Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Use of Indonesian in International Contracts: Sadd Dzariah's Perspective Kusnadi, Egi Hadi; Al Haq, Syaif; Muazzami, Al
Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah Vol 16, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v16i2.42512

Abstract

Based on Law 24/2009, international contracts made in Indonesia must use Indonesian. What about contracts made with foreign parties without using Indonesian, are they null and void or have binding force? This research is normative research using the statutory regulations approach, the judge's decision approach, and the Sadd Dzariah approach. The research results show that there are differences in decisions made by judges regarding the obligation to use Indonesian in international contracts, causing this obligation to be biased. In Sadd Dzariah's approach, the use of Indonesian in contracts made with foreign parties is mandatory, in line with the regulation in Law 24/2009. This aims to avoid bad faith which could result in default or unlawful actions. Berdasar pada UU 24/2009, kontrak internasional yang dibuat di Indonesia wajib menggunakan bahasa Indonesia. Bagaimana dengan kontrak yang dilakukan dengan pihak asing tanpa menggunakan bahasa Indonesia, apakah batal demi hukum atau mempunyai kekuatan mengikat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan putusan hakim, dan pendekatan Sadd Dzariah. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat perbedaan putusan yang dilakukan oleh hakim terhadap kewajiban penggunaan bahasa Indonesia dalam kontrak internasional, sehingga menyebabkan kewajiban tersebut menjadi bias. Dalam pendekatan Sadd Dzariah, penggunaan bahasa Indonesia terhadap kontrak yang dibuat dengan pihak asing adalah wajib, selaras dengan yang telah diatur dalam UU 24/2009. Hal ini bertujuan untuk menghindari adanya itikad buruk yang dapat mengakibatkan wanprestasi atau tindakan melawan hukum. 
Institutionalizing the Concept of Legal Pluralism as an Effort to Realize Substantive Justice Al Haq, Syaif; Pratama, Aditya Andel; Rozaan, Zaim; Sadiq, Muh. Fajar; Rukmini, Neng Vivie Nurfauziah
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): October
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The concept of legal pluralism is a solution to the problem of diversity in a pluralistic country. Interestingly, although Indonesia recognizes diversity as the philosophical foundation of the life of the nation and state, the concept of legal pluralism has not been fully institutionalized. This article will explain, analyze, and explore the discourse of legal pluralism and substantive justice and explain the concept of institutionalizing legal pluralism in Indonesia as an effort to realize substantive justice for all Indonesian people. This research is a normative juridical research with conceptual, legislative, historical, and analytical approaches. The data of this research is literature data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The collection of legal materials is done through literature studies and analyzed using a qualitative approach with description and analysis techniques. The results show that legal pluralism not only allows recognition of the diversity of existing laws, but also has the potential to overcome the shortcomings of formal legal systems that tend to be homogeneous and less responsive to local contexts. The recommendation is for policy makers to reform the legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture that support the coexistence and interaction between various legal systems, so that substantive justice can be achieved through a more contextual and adaptive approach. The impact of institutionalizing legal pluralism is the realization of a strong legal pluralism system, a plural legal society, and substantive social justice for all Indonesian people.
The Use of Indonesian in International Contracts: Sadd Dzariah's Perspective Kusnadi, Egi Hadi; Al Haq, Syaif; Muazzami, Al
Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/aiq.v16i2.42512

Abstract

Based on Law 24/2009, international contracts made in Indonesia must use Indonesian. What about contracts made with foreign parties without using Indonesian, are they null and void or have binding force? This research is normative research using the statutory regulations approach, the judge's decision approach, and the Sadd Dzariah approach. The research results show that there are differences in decisions made by judges regarding the obligation to use Indonesian in international contracts, causing this obligation to be biased. In Sadd Dzariah's approach, the use of Indonesian in contracts made with foreign parties is mandatory, in line with the regulation in Law 24/2009. This aims to avoid bad faith which could result in default or unlawful actions. Berdasar pada UU 24/2009, kontrak internasional yang dibuat di Indonesia wajib menggunakan bahasa Indonesia. Bagaimana dengan kontrak yang dilakukan dengan pihak asing tanpa menggunakan bahasa Indonesia, apakah batal demi hukum atau mempunyai kekuatan mengikat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan putusan hakim, dan pendekatan Sadd Dzariah. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa terdapat perbedaan putusan yang dilakukan oleh hakim terhadap kewajiban penggunaan bahasa Indonesia dalam kontrak internasional, sehingga menyebabkan kewajiban tersebut menjadi bias. Dalam pendekatan Sadd Dzariah, penggunaan bahasa Indonesia terhadap kontrak yang dibuat dengan pihak asing adalah wajib, selaras dengan yang telah diatur dalam UU 24/2009. Hal ini bertujuan untuk menghindari adanya itikad buruk yang dapat mengakibatkan wanprestasi atau tindakan melawan hukum.