Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Madinah Asri Putri Andarin
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Public Health

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KONTESTASI HUKUM WARIS ADAT DENGAN HUKUM ISLAM TERHADAP PEMBAGIAN TANAH WARISAN DI DESA PAYUNG, KABUPATEN KARO Dinda Tazkia Aulia; Feri Ardilansyah Harahap; Abd. Rahman Harahap; Isro Ayu Marbun; Madinah Asri Putri Andarin; Mae Syarah; Wina Aswita; Zahra Afiqah; Salsabila Athirah
Community Development Journal : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Volume 6 No. 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/cdj.v6i1.41107

Abstract

Indonesia memiliki keanekaragaman budaya dan sistem hukum, termasuk hukum waris yang melibatkan hukum adat, hukum Islam, dan hukum perdata. Desa Payung, Kabupaten Karo, menghadapi kontestasi hukum waris adat dan hukum Islam dalam pembagian tanah warisan. Hukum adat Karo, dengan sistem patriarki, memprioritaskan anak laki-laki sebagai pewaris utama, sedangkan hukum Islam memberikan hak kepada semua ahli waris sesuai prinsip faraid. Konflik sering terjadi karena perbedaan pandangan ini, yang memengaruhi keharmonisan keluarga dan masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis respons masyarakat terhadap perbedaan kedua sistem hukum dan mengidentifikasi strategi penyelesaian konflik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah empiris yaitu melibatkan observasi lapangan, wawancara mendalam dengan tokoh adat, ulama, ahli waris, dan tokoh masyarakat, serta analisis dokumen hukum. Hasil penelitian memberikan wawasan mengenai upaya mediasi dan penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif melalui musyawarah keluarga, peran tokoh adat dan ulama, serta pengadilan agama.
Confession as a Ground for Case Termination in KPPU from the Perspective of Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah (A Study of Decision Number 04/KPPU-I/2024) Madinah Asri Putri Andarin; Mustapa Khamal Rokan
Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): All articles in this issue include authors from 3 countrie
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/kharaj.v8i3.11852

Abstract

This study analyzes the position of confession as a ground for case termination in KPPU Decision Number 04/KPPU-I/2024 and examines it from the perspective of Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah. The background of this research is based on the behavioral change mechanism introduced under KPPU Regulation Number 2 of 2023, which allows the reported party to acknowledge the alleged violation and submit commitments for behavioral improvement, as well as concerns that confession may become a shortcut that weakens the deterrence function and the protection of public interests. This study employs normative juridical research using the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using deductive reasoning. The findings indicate that confession is not the sole basis for case termination but rather an initial requirement to enter the behavioral change mechanism. The termination of the case in KPPU Decision Number 04/KPPU-I/2024 was carried out after the commitments to behavioral change had been declared fulfilled through a process of supervision and verification in accordance with KPPU Regulation Number 2 of 2023. From the perspective of Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah, confession (iqrār) is a highly authoritative form of evidence but cannot stand alone without supporting proof capable of revealing the objective truth. Therefore, the case termination mechanism is fundamentally consistent with the legal thought of Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah. However, the effectiveness and legitimacy of case termination ultimately depend on the objectivity and accountability of the verification process regarding the implementation of the behavioral change commitments.
Co-Authors Abd. Rahman Harahap Dinda Tazkia Aulia Feri Ardilansyah Harahap Isro Ayu Marbun Mae Syarah Mustapa  Khamal  Rokan Salsabila Athirah Wina Aswita Zahra Afiqah