Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Evaluasi Perencanaan Geometrik Jalan Berbasis BIM (Studi Kasus: Jalan Banda Aceh Outer Ring Road) Faisal, Ruhdi; Rifqi, Arif; Salmannur, Alfi
Journal of The Civil Engineering Student Vol 6, No 3 (2024): Volume 6 Nomor 3 September 2024
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/journalces.v6i3.31616

Abstract

An optimal road geometric design considers the efficiency of the time required in the design and construction process. This study aims to determine the difference in the results of road geometric calculations using AutoCAD Civil 3D with manual calculations in the case study of Banda Aceh Outer Ring Road (BORR) STA 0+000 - STA13+364.40. The method used for road geometric calculations refers to the 2011 AASHTO standard. However, in terms of planning criteria, it follows the 2021 Road Geometric Design Guidelines standard. The horizontal alignment design produces 9 bends, namely 2 FC curves and 7 SCS curves. In the vertical alignment planning, there are 4 convex vertical curves and 6 concave vertical curves with slopes between 0.00% and 5.80%, which are below the maximum slope of 6%. The length of Lv in the design of concave and convex vertical arches meets the criteria determined by the value of K. Based on the results obtained, the use of AutoCAD Civil 3D has proven effective in assisting the calculation and design of design drawings simultaneously so that the work process becomes more efficient, concise, and minimizes human error.
Racial Discrimination in The Great Debaters Movie Rifqi, Arif; Harida, Ratri; Ro’is, Syamsuddin
SALIENCE: English Language, Literature, and Education Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2025): Mei
Publisher : STKIP PGRI Ponorogo Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60155/salience.v5i1.561

Abstract

The Great Debaters serves as a powerful cinematic text that offers a multifaceted exploration of racial injustice and intellectual resistance through the strategic deployment of racist utterances—whether in the form of slurs, threats, institutionalized policies, or internalized oppression. The movie lays bare the linguistic mechanisms that reinforce racial hierarchies and social marginalization. The 26 utterances function as discursive acts that reflect and reproduce unequal power relations, as revealed through a critical discourse analysis grounded in Fairclough’s model. Through the utterances, the viewers gain insight into the normalization of racism through everyday language and institutional discourse. One example of this was the juxtaposition of brutal historical references (such as the Willie Lynch narrative) with moments of rhetorical resistance (e.g., the assertion of Black identity and intellectual agency in debate scenes) that illuminates the ongoing struggle over meaning, representation, and voice. The movie acts as both a historical recounting and a pedagogical tool, inviting critical engagement with how language constructs racial identities and sustains systemic injustice. As a medium of reasoned argument, persuasion, and public voice, the utterances of the Wiley College debate team demonstrated a form of social activism and identity reclamation. This framing enables educators and students alike to connect historical struggles for civil rights with contemporary discourses surrounding race, equity, and education.