Ryantoni, Hanugra
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Explore the Values of Pancasila as the Basic Philosophy of the Indonesian Nation Sudirta, I Wayan; Pieris, John; Nugroho, Wachid; Ryantoni, Hanugra
Arena Hukum Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum2025.01801.6

Abstract

This research explores the values of Pancasila in three approaches: beliefs, knowledge and action dimension. Legal construction and deconstruction methods are used in this research. Some previous studies that distinguish this research, Nataliana, et.al (2022) discusses Pancasila within the scope of the Indonesian maritime state, Izzati and Muslikhah (2024) analyses Pancasila as the philosophy of the Indonesian nation, and Junia, et.al (2025) explores Pancasila in its level as an ideology and state philosophy. The striking difference from this research is the depth of discussion about Pancasila in this journal to find findings related to the foundation of Pancasila as the philosophy of the Indonesian state.  The values in Pancasila developed along with the formulation by the founding fathers, but remained at the root of Soekarno’s conception that Pancasila as Philosofische Grondslag and as Weltanschaung. In Pancasila there are values that contain cultural values (the first, second and third precepts), political values and mutual cooperation (fourth precept), and material values and justice (fifth precept). All of these values have not been the basis of work and the preparation of policy platforms in all lines and Indonesian state administration. The contribution of research to legal science can be seen from the position of Pancasila as a state ideology that is explored more deeply in this research in order to explore its values as the basis of the Indonesian nation and become a reflection for other countries in exploring the philosophical values of their state ideology. 
Reconstructing The Relationship Regional Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia with Regional Government for The Optimization of Regional Autonomy Ryantoni, Hanugra; Pieris, John; Siahaan, Maruarar; Narang, Agustin Teras
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5257

Abstract

As a regional representative institution, the Regional Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia (DPD) was born from the idea of changing the representative system into a two-chamber representative system and increasing regional participation in the course of politics and state management. The ideal concept of DPD, was initially to accommodate the principle of regional representation and regional empowerment. DPD as a regional representative in carrying out its duties and functions requires effective coordination with the Regional Government as the executor of executive power in the region. Empirically, the construction of the relationship between the DPD and the regional government is currently not optimal. One of the obligations of the DPD is to follow up on regional aspirations and interests is still carried out normatively and ineffectively. This is certainly not ideal as the construction of Article 18, Article 18A, Article 18B, Article 22D, and Article 23 of the UUD 1945 are interrelated. Where the presence of the DPD (in Article 22D) as a regional representative institution is necessary to maintain the existence of the region (Article 18, Article 18A, and Article 18B). Based on the research findings, it is important to recommend that central government along with the DPR and DPD need to consider special arrangements in the form of affirmation of decentralized authority and effective central-regional relations, especially to resolve regional problems. Meanwhile, there needs to be a reconstruction of the DPD's supervisory and budget functions that have a direct impact on the community and regions; optimization of existing functions, such as the monitoring and evaluation function of draft regional regulations and regional regulations, as well as the monitoring and review function of laws for the harmonization of central-regional laws; and there needs to be a pattern of support for the DPD to optimize its performance.