Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Narra J

KOMPAK: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of an instrument for assessing interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and physicians in Indonesia Amin, Irnawati H.; Massi, Muhammad N.; Wahyudin, Elly; Bahar, Muhammad A.; Hadju, Veni; Niamuzisilawati, Eva; Munawwaroh, Makiyatul; Utami, Ikrimah N.; Ardiansyah, Akhmad; Alkaff, Sylmina D.; Arifin, Bustanul
Narra J Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): April 2025
Publisher : Narra Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.1309

Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration is crucial for addressing the complexity of health problems, requiring contributions from various professions to enhance healthcare quality, improve patient satisfaction, and achieve better clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the physicians and pharmacists collaborative practice instrument, known as KOMPAK (Kolaborasi Medis Persepsi Apoteker dan Dokter/Medical Collaboration: Perceptions of Pharmacists and Physicians) for use in Indonesia. A cross-sectional study was conducted across the western, central, and eastern rigors of Indonesia, targeting physicians and pharmacists. The study included translation (forward and backward), cross-cultural adaptation (with 30 participants), and validation using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) among 315 physicians and 315 pharmacists. The present study found no significant changes emerged during the translation and adaptation phases. In the validation phase, the CFA results for the physician instrument indicated a Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.94 (>0.92), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) of 0.93 (>0.92), Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation (RMSEA) of 0.055 (<0.07), Standardized Root Mean Residual (SRMR) of 0.07 (<0.08), and Cronbach’s Alpha reliability of 0.88. The pharmacist instrument yielded similar results with a CFI of 0.94 (>0.92), TLI of 0.93 (>0.92), RMSEA of 0.06 (<0.07), SRMR of 0.05 (<0.08), and Cronbach’s Alpha reliability of 0.83. The final instrument consists of 24 items. In conclusion, the KOMPAK instrument demonstrated validity and reliability, supporting its use for measuring interprofessional collaboration between physicians and pharmacists in Indonesia.
Stigma and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among people with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB): A cross-sectional study in Indonesia Arifin, Bustanul; Sarwadan, Muhamad G.; Wahyudin, Elly; Sarifah, Latifah M.; Fuady, Ahmad; Purba, Fredrick D.; Alkaff, Sylmina D.; Ardiansyah, Akhmad; Madolangan, Jamaluddin
Narra J Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : Narra Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52225/narra.v5i2.1317

Abstract

Stigma often accompanies people with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and potentially affects their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to investigate the stigma faced by patients with MDR-TB, both from the patients' and community's perspective, and its relationship with HRQoL. Data was gathered at the provincial hospital in Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The instrument employed in this research was the Indonesian version of the tuberculosis (TB) stigma instrument to assess MDR-TB stigma from the patient and community perspectives. The patient perspective represents how individuals with TB perceive and experience stigma, including the fear of disclosure, isolation, and guilt (feeling responsible for the burden on their family or their own risky behaviors). Meanwhile, the community perspective reflects how individuals with TB perceive societal attitudes towards them, such as social distancing, avoidance, and reluctance to interact. HRQoL was measured using the European quality of life-5 dimensions-5 level version (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. Notably, the evaluation of anxiety and depression is centered on the fifth dimension of the EQ-5D-5L instrument. A total of 210 patients with MDR-TB were included in the study, all of whom reported experiencing stigma. Most participants perceived stigma at a moderate level, with 76% from the patient perspective and 71% from the community perspective. The average EQ-5D-5L index score was 0.72 (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.68–0.76). Measurements from both perspectives show similar scores. There is a substantial negative association between the level of stigma and HRQoL, both from the patient's perspective (R2=-0.33; F=102.52; p<0.001) and the community's (R2=-0.32; F=96.76; p<0.001). The study highlights that the stigma of MDR-TB significantly affects the HRQoL from the patient and community perspective.