Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal University Of Bengkulu Law Journal JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum
Husna, Muhammad Badarul
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Existence of Policy Regulations (Beleidsregel) in the Indonesian Legislative System Patra, Rommy; Syafei, Muhammad; Husna, Muhammad Badarul; Djohan, Muhammad Irwan; Famula, Deea Rizky
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): OCTOBER
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.v9i2.33506

Abstract

The phenomenon of many types of statutory regulations being formed, there is the formation of a number of policy regulations. The main issue related to policy regulations is the issue of accountability and supervision. Because its formation is based on "free" authority, this policy regulation is vulnerable to abuse even though the accountability mechanism is not clear. The problems are: (1) What is the existence of policy regulations related to legal force and the implications that arise from their implementation? (2) How is policy regulation carried out to ensure that there is no abuse of power? This research uses normative legal research methods. Research results: The existence of policy regulations (beleidsregel) was formed not based on attribution or delegation authority from the Constitution and Laws, but was formed on one's own initiative (discretion) in order to resolve the government administration problems faced. Policy regulations are not statutory regulations and are not directly legally binding. The unclear status of policy regulations has the implication that the supervision carried out over them is still not optimal because there are no explicit regulations regarding the supervision mechanisms that can be carried out. To clarify the scope of supervision of policy regulations, there needs to be a revision of Law no. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration so that supervision of the use of discretion is not only aimed at decisions and/or actions of Government Officials but also includes supervision of the use of discretion which results in policy regulations. Apart from that, a monitoring mechanism through the judiciary must be sought where the Supreme Court must have consistency in its decisions and provide criteria related to policy regulations that can be tested to control them so that they are not misused. Keywords: discretion; policy regulations; supervision
Penataan Kewenangan dan Hubungan Kelembagaan dalam Pembentukan Pengadilan HAM AD HOC untuk Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM yang Berat di Masa Lalu Patra, Rommy; Husna, Muhammad Badarul; Habib, SY. Arifin
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 05 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i05.1695

Abstract

Dalam tulisan ini dikaji persoalan kewenangan dan hubungan kelembagaan terkait pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc untuk penyelesaian kasus pelanggaran HAM yang berat di masa lalu. Permasalahan: Pertama, faktor-faktor apa saja yang menyebabkan belum optimalnya pelaksanaan kewenangan dan hubungan kelembagaan pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc sehingga menyebabkan kasus pelanggaran HAM yang berat di masa lalu tidak jelas penyelesaiannya? Kedua, Bagaimana upaya penataan kewenangan dan hubungan kelembagaan terkait pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc dalam menyelesaikan kasus pelanggaran HAM yang berat di masa lalu? Metode penelitian adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil: Pertama, belum optimalnya pelaksanaan kewenangan dan hubungan kelembagaan pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc disebabkan ketidakjelasan mekanisme pembentukannya dan begitu banyak lembaga yang punya wewenang dalam pembentukannya, seperti Presiden, DPR, Komnas HAM dan Kejaksaan Agung. Implikasi yang terjadi adalah overlapping antar lembaga yang memiliki kewenangan. Kedua, penataan hubungan kelembagaan pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc dengan penegasan hasil penyelidikan Komnas HAM harus ditindaklanjuti penyidikan dan penuntutan oleh Jaksa Agung. Serta hasil penyelidikan juga diserahkan kepada Presiden yang dalam jangka waktu tertentu wajib menetapkan Keppres pembentukan Pengadilan HAM ad hoc.
Co-Authors Djohan, Muhammad Irwan Famula, Deea Rizky Habib, SY. Arifin Muhammad Syafei, Muhammad Rommy Patra