Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal USRATY : Journal of Islamic Family Law Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Demiral, Ferik
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Sosiologi Hukum Islam Terhadap Larangan Nikah Sasuku dalam Adat Minangkabau Al Amin, Muhamad; Demiral, Ferik; Palevi, Reza; Mahyuzi, Indra
USRATY : Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/usraty.v2i1.8378

Abstract

The prohibition of same-clan marriage in Minangkabau customs is still enforced by the Minangkabau community today, despite various differences in the application of leniencies and sanctions established in different nagari (villages) for those who engage in same-clan marriages. This prohibition was set by customary institutions at that time to address the social conditions of the community. Although the social conditions that led to this prohibition have changed, it remains upheld by the Minangkabau people to this day. In examining this phenomenon, this research utilizes an Islamic legal sociology approach to observe the shifts in social conditions that have occurred. This study aims to explore how the prohibition of same-clan marriage has maintained its existence within the Minangkabau community and continues to be practiced today. The research is primarily library-based, collecting various supporting literary sources. In Minangkabau customs, the prohibition of same-clan marriage is enforced to prevent various harms that may arise from such unions for their clans, making it considered taboo and bringing shame to their kin. This belief reinforces the community's perception of avoiding these marriages. The perception built within the Minangkabau community can be understood through the Islamic legal sociology approach as a means to prevent potential harms arising from this marriage (sad adz-dzari'ah). Additionally, the societal perception of the taboo surrounding this marriage can serve as a social control mechanism that strengthens the Minangkabau people's conviction to avoid such unions, allowing this custom to endure.
Ta’zir Punishment for Adultery in Indonesian and Malaysian Law from a Maqashid Sharia Perspective Demiral, Ferik; Daipon, Dahyul; Usqho, Mutia Urdatul
Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v4i1.1316

Abstract

This research examines the application of ta’zir punishment for adultery in Indonesian and Malaysian law from the perspective of Maqasid Sharia. It explores how society perceives, interprets, and responds to these regulations, with particular attention to whether their implementation aligns with the higher objectives of Islamic law in safeguarding religion, life, lineage, intellect, and property. Using a qualitative field research approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with legal practitioners, Islamic scholars, and community leaders, complemented by observations and documentation analysis in both Indonesia and Malaysia. The findings reveal that in Malaysia, particularly in states with Syariah Criminal Enactments, adultery provisions are viewed as a religious duty to preserve morality and lineage, although enforcement remains constrained by federal constitutional limits. In Indonesia, the inclusion of adultery provisions in the new Criminal Code has triggered intense debates between groups advocating moral protection and those emphasizing human rights and pluralism. From a Maqasid Sharia perspective, both contexts reflect sincere efforts to safeguard lineage and public morality; however, challenges persist regarding justice, proportionality, and the balance between individual rights and collective interests. This study concludes that the discourse on adultery punishment represents deeper negotiations between Islamic values, constitutional frameworks, and contemporary social realities. Its academic contribution lies in demonstrating how Maqasid Sharia can be operationalized as an analytical framework for assessing ta’zir punishments, thereby enriching Islamic legal scholarship in Southeast Asia.
Co-Authors Al Amin, Muhamad Dahyul Daipon Mahyuzi, Indra Reza Palevi, Reza Usqho, Mutia Urdatul