Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Comparison of Bored Pile Capacity Based on Analytical Design and Pile Load Test – A Case Study Putri, Karina Meilawati Eka; Fatikasari, Aulia Dewi; Wibisana, Hendrata
International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology Vol 5, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Malikussaleh University, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52088/ijesty.v5i1.659

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of bored pile ultimate capacity based on analytical design and field tests. The object of this analysis is the bored pile foundation of the Sei Alalak Bridge in Banjarmasin, Indonesia. The analytical design of pile ultimate capacity was carried out using the empirical methods provided by Reese and O'Neill (1988) and Meyerhof (1976). The calculation of pile ultimate capacity using the empirical method is based on SPT data from four boreholes representing soil data in the abutment, tower, and counterweight zones. Two pile load tests were used to validate the analytical design: pile driving analysis (PDA) and the bi-axial load test Osterberg Cell (O-Cell). The pile ultimate capacity from the empirical method is then compared to field tests regarding pile shaft resistance and end-bearing capacity. The analysis results indicate that the empirical methods tend to underestimate the pile's ultimate capacity by 30–60%. The results reveal that the Reese and O'neill (1988) empirical method generates a significantly lower pile ultimate capacity than Meyerhof (1976). This indicates that the Meyerhof (1976) method gives a closer result of pile ultimate capacity than the field test. On the contrary, the Reese and O'Neill (1988) method is more consistent with the PDA test results. As a result, in this study, the Reese and O'Neill (1988) method is preferred over the Meyerhof (1976) method for predicting the ultimate capacity of a bored pile since it has been demonstrated to be more reliable in estimating the pile's ultimate capacity.
Kombinasi Alat Berat pada Pekerjaan Pemindahan Tanah Dan Galian pada Pembangunan Jalan Jalur Lintas Selatan Lot 3 Pantai Serang – Sumbersih Septiono, Wisnu Panji; Syahputra, Aldy; Wibisana, Hendrata; Putri, Karina Meilawati Eka
Jurnal Talenta Sipil Vol 8, No 1 (2025): Februari
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/talentasipil.v8i1.827

Abstract

The construction of roads is one of the key aspects to support economic growth and facilitate community mobility. A crucial stage in this project is the earthmoving and excavation work, which requires proper heavy equipment planning to achieve efficiency in terms of time, cost, and quality. This analysis aims to evaluate the optimal combination of heavy equipment for the construction project of the South Coastal Road (JLS) Lot 3 Pantai Serang – Sumbersih, focusing on excavation and earthmoving tasks. The project faces complex geographical challenges, such as hilly terrain and varying soil types, which necessitate the use of suitable heavy equipment to optimize productivity. Using a quantitative approach, data collection, documentation studies, and interviews were conducted. The collected data were then analyzed using productivity calculation formulas for heavy equipment to identify the most efficient combination of heavy machinery. The results show that a combination of heavy equipment consisting of 1 Kobelco SK200 excavator, 1 Kobelco SK200 excavator, 4 dump trucks, and a bulldozer can improve work efficiency and reduce the required time and costs. Hence, Combination 1 was selected as the most optimal choice for excavation and earthmoving work in the JLS Lot 3 Pantai Serang – Sumbersih road construction project, achieving a total duration of 15,730 hours and a cost of IDR 25,837,774,442.
Financial Performance Assessment of Flat Buildings Using Life Cycle Cost and Cost–Benefit Analysis Velantika, Griselda Junianda; Mikhail, Reguel; Putri, Karina Meilawati Eka; Widowati, Elok Dewi; Alghiffary, Rizqi; Akbari, Muhamad Fauzan
Advance Sustainable Science Engineering and Technology Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): November-January
Publisher : Science and Technology Research Centre Universitas PGRI Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26877/asset.v7i1.1005

Abstract

Buildings resulting from construction projects are durable assets and decisions related to construction projects have enduring impacts. In many cases, building owners prioritize only the initial costs, such as building design, construction, and equipment costs, while neglecting the future operation and maintenance costs. This research studies life cycle costing (LCC) analysis to evaluate the financial feasibility of urban housing. The LCC calculates all the costs incurred and benefits during the building's operation. The cost is generated from construction, operational, and maintenance costs. At the same time, the benefit breaks down into flat rental costs, retail rental costs, and parking costs. The costs incurred are estimated over 25 years, and the parameters of feasibility are net Present Value (NPV), Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR), and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). The study generates negative NPV, BCR < 1, and 0.61% of IRR. It indicates that the project is not feasible. This research gives alternatives to make the project feasible. This study employed a trial-and-error approach to ascertain the viability of investing in flat rentals by systematically adjusting rental rates. Incremental adjustments to rental rates are tested by a series of rate hikes of 50%, 100%, 150%, and 200% using a trial-and-error approach. The project will become feasible if the flat rate increases to 150-200% of the initial rental rate.
Dynamics Responses of a Block Machine Foundation and a Pile Group Foundation Systems on Stratified Residual Soils in Indonesia by Lumped Mass and Finite Element Methods Susila, Endra; Ary, Wim Ramartsa; Sahadewa, Andhika; Putri, Karina Meilawati Eka; Zulkifli, Ediansjah; Sadono, Kresno Wikan
Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences Vol. 56 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Directorate for Research and Community Services, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2024.56.2.6

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive study of the dynamic responses of machine foundations, both block and pile foundations, on stratified residual soils in Duri and Ulubelu, Indonesia. The evaluation was conducted using two widely recognized methods: the lumped mass method (LMM) and the finite element method (FEM). LMM and FEM were performed by utilizing DYNA and ABAQUS, respectively. The analysis results showed that LMM generally predicted more conservative displacements compared to FEM. This conservatism in predicted displacement was more pronounced for pile group foundations, which are inherently more flexible than block foundations. Additionally, this study found that the resonance frequencies obtained through both analysis methods were not the same. Furthermore, this paper includes a parametric study and presents its results to assess the influence of key factors, i.e., pile cap thickness, pile diameter, number of piles, and vertical dynamic loads, on displacement.