Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PREDATECS: Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science
Gandini, Ganis Lintang
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Applying A Supervised Model for Diabetes Type 2 Risk Level Classification Dhani, Ahmad; Lestari, Danur; Ningrum, Meriana Prihati; Fakhrizal, M. Andhika; Gandini, Ganis Lintang
Public Research Journal of Engineering, Data Technology and Computer Science Vol. 2 No. 2: PREDATECS January 2025
Publisher : Institute of Research and Publication Indonesia (IRPI).

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57152/predatecs.v2i2.1105

Abstract

Diabetes can lead to heart attacks, kidney failure, blindness, and increased risk of death. This research was conducted with the aim of classifying a diabetes risk dataset. In this context, performance comparison was carried out on three supervised learning algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbor, Naive Bayes, and Random Forest, against a dataset containing information on specific indicators related to diabetes risk. Additionally, this study also aimed to evaluate the accuracy comparison of the results produced by these three algorithms. The results of this research show that Random Forest performs very well in detecting diabetes, prediabetes, and non-diabetes, with high precision, recall, and F1-score levels. Meanwhile, although the results are still below Random Forest, both Naive Bayes and K-NN still demonstrate significant performance, especially regarding prediabetes cases. In conclusion, from the comparison results, the Random Forest algorithm shows the highest accuracy level at 99%, followed by K-Nearest Neighbor with an accuracy of 85%, while Naive Bayes has the lowest accuracy rate of 74%. This research indicates that the Random Forest algorithm excels in classifying data compared to the other two algorithms.
Co-Authors Dhani, Ahmad Fakhrizal, M. Andhika Lestari, Danur Ningrum, Meriana Prihati