Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Competency, Motivation, and Supervision Technique Strong Predict to Completeness of Nursing Documentation Wongso, Erni Suryani; Tahjoo, Anastina; Nofierni, Nofierni
International Journal of Nursing and Health Services (IJNHS) Vol. 7 No. 5 (2024): International Journal of Nursing and Health Services (IJHNS)
Publisher : Alta Dharma Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35654/ijnhs.v7i5.800

Abstract

Background: The inconsistency in the results of previous research conducted regarding competency, motivation and completeness of nursing documents motivated the research was carry out. Objective: This study aimed to examine empirical evidence regarding the mediation of disclosure of supervision techniques on competence and motivation on the completeness of nursing documentation. Method: A quantitative study with the cross-sectional approach was conducted in this study. This study was conducted in the dr. Achmad Diponegoro hospital. Forty-five respondents were involved in this study which is selected using the purposively sampling. We applied the path analysis to examine the association between competency, motivation, and supervision technique with completeness of nursing documentation. Result: The research results show empirical evidence that simultaneously competence and motivation have a positive and significant effect on supervision techniques. Competence, motivation and supervision techniques have a positive and significant effect on the completeness of nursing documentation. However, supervision techniques were not successful in mediating the influence of competence and motivation on the completeness of nursing documentation because the direct influence was greater than the indirect influence. Implication: The implication of the research is that management must provide training and provide facilities so that health workers can improve their competence and hold activities or awards for health workers who have good performance in recording nursing documents so that their motivation increases
Limitations of Criminal Punishment for Corruption Criminal Act Article 2 and Article 3 of the Corruption Criminal Act are Linked to the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2020 (Case Study of the high Court Decision Semarang Number 22/PID. TPK/2020/PT. SMG Nirmansyah, Sandy; Wongso, Erni Suryani; Prayuti, Yuyut
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1689

Abstract

The issuance of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2020 concerning the Guidelines for Sentencing Article 2 and Article 3 of the Corruption Law, has given rise to pros and cons. The opposing opinion states that Article 2 and Article 3 of the Corruption Law, are sufficient to provide guidelines for sentencing so that there is no disparity in decisions, because both articles already regulate minimum and maximum sentences. The issuance of Perma No. 1 of 2020 is a form of intervention by the Supreme Court regarding the independence of judges in deciding a case. This is certainly contrary to Article 24 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. In addition, the issuance of Perma No. 1 of 2020 is also considered to have violated the principles in the formation of laws and regulations as regulated in Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Laws and Regulations. The decision of the Corruption Court which is the object of this research whose decision is guided by Perma No. 1 of 2020, such as the Decision of the Semarang District Court No. 41/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2020/PN.Smg, dated September 21, 2020, which has been canceled by the Semarang High Court Decision No. 22/Pid.Tpk/2020/PT.Smg,  dated December 7, 2020, because the state losses have been recovered, so that the Bandung High Court decision has fulfilled substantive justice. In addition, the Formation of Perma No. 1 of 2020 is legally flawed because there is no higher statutory regulation order and it was not made based on the authority of the Supreme Court