Syafril Siregar
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

User Experience Evaluation of e-Puskesmas in Payakumbuh City using the User Experience Questionnaire Method Furqan Anwari; Eki Saputra; Arif Marsal; Mona Fronita; Muhammad Jazman; Syafril Siregar
Journal of Innovation and Technology Polbeng Series on Informatics (INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri Informatika) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : P3M Politeknik Negeri Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35314/z7dkt524

Abstract

Puskesmas in Indonesia are responsible for providing primary health services to the local community. The Community Health Centers (Puskesmas) in Indonesia utilise e-Puskesmas, a web-based system that enables electronic data management and patient services. The newest version, e-Puskesmas Next Generation (NG), was made to allow online interactions, but it has had some technical problems, including duplicate medical data and wrong medication dosages because it doesn't have an allergy detection feature. The UEQ method will be used to rate the user experience of e-Puskesmas. The UEQ measures six factors: attractiveness, efficiency, perspicuity, dependability, stimulation, and novelty. Twenty-one people participated in the evaluation, and the results show that all variables were close to neutral. This means that using the system doesn't make people very happy or sad, but instead stays at an average level. This study confirms that, although e-Puskesmas has the potential to be an effective tool, there is still significant room for improvement, especially in terms of feature customisation and user interface. The "poor" score in the benchmark evaluation indicates that significant improvements in the system's design and functionality are necessary to enhance user satisfaction and healthcare service efficiency. It is hoped that these findings can encourage further development that addresses the existing shortcomings and effectively improves the management of health services at the community health centre
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANDROID-BASED ONLINE TRANSPORTATION APPLICATION SECURITY USING MOBILE SECURITY FRAMEWORK (MOBSF) Triyawan Bagus Subakja; Mona Fronita; Syaifullah Syaifullah; Tengku Khairil Ahsyar; Syafril Siregar
JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika) Vol 10, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : STKIP PGRI Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29100/jipi.v10i2.6185

Abstract

Online transportation is a service provided over the internet, representing a technological innovation that has significantly facilitated travel for Indonesians. These applications have gained widespread adoption in Indonesia, serving as alternatives to conventional transport modes like taxis and traditional motorcycle taxis. They offer convenience and speed in booking rides, along with secure transactions through digital payment systems. Despite the user-friendly experience and advantages offered by these applications, their security cannot be overlooked. The increasing accessibility of Android-based online transportation applications has made them a prime target for malicious actors ("Crackers") who may exploit vulnerabilities for nefarious purposes. This research aims to identify security vulnerabilities and compare the security found in Android-based online transportation applications. The researcher utilized the Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) to conduct static security analysis focusing on parameters such as dangerous permissions, weak cryptography, root detection, SSL bypass, and domain malware checks. The security assessments of Gojek, Maxim, and Grab revealed moderate security risks. Gojek scored 44/100, Maxim 47/100, and Grab 50/100 in terms of security ratings. All three applications were found to have vulnerabilities related to dangerous permissions and weak cryptography. Specifically, Maxim was also susceptible to SSL bypass attacks. None of the applications had implemented root detection, but their domain malware checks were deemed satisfactory.