Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Eksperimental Perbandingan Kekuatan Tekan Karakteristik Beton Self Compacting Menggunakan Agregat Kasar Alami Dan Agregat Kasar Daur Ulang Martinus Pramanata Sapeai; Johannes Adhijoso Tjondro
Jurnal Poli-Teknologi Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32722/pt.v19i1.2698

Abstract

Utilization of recycled concrete waste as an alternative to natural coarse aggregates in this experiment is in accordance with the concept of sustainable construction. Concrete is the main material of structural elements most commonly used in general construction and has properties that are difficult to recycle by themselves naturally. Nowdays concrete innovation with the concept of self compacting (SCC) is widely used especially in high rise building and buildings with special specification. SCC has high flowability properties so that it can flow and compact themselves, but in SCC with normal quality still need compactor. The concept of making test specimens is in accordance with real conditions in the field, where aggregates do not go through a cleaning process. There are four different mix design with the required specified compressive strength of 20 MPa. Mix design 1A (natural coarse) and 1B (recycled coarse aggregates) has a maximum aggregate size 12.50 mm, and mix design 2A (natural coarse) and 2B (recycled coarse aggregates) has a maximum aggregate size 19.00 mm. This experimental results in specified compressive strength concrete for mix design 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B as follows: 30.93 MPa, 26.21 MPa, 30.82 MPa and 27.60 MPa. Therefore, recycled concrete aggregates can be alternative to natural coarse aggregates and can also be made into concrete with the SCC concept.
KAJIAN EKSPERIMENTAL STRESSED SKIN PANEL MENGGUNAKAN CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER DAN GLULAM Naomi Pratiwi; Johannes Adhijoso Tjondro; Alexander Mario Kwa
CRANE: Civil Engineering Research Journal Vol 7 No 2 (2026): CRANE - OKTOBER
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik dan Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Komputer Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34010/crane.v7i2.19820

Abstract

Engineered wood products such as glulam and Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) offer sustainable alternatives to large-dimension structural timber. This study investigates the flexural behavior of Stress Skin Panels (SSP) composed of CLT skins and glulam stringers, comparing single-skin (SSP-T) and double-skin (SSP-G) configurations using Sengon wood. Static bending tests were conducted on two specimens per configuration to evaluate strength, stiffness, ductility, and failure modes. Results show that the double-skin configuration yields limited increases in ultimate capacity by 7.8% and stiffness by 8.2%, indicating partial composite action. However, deformation capacity increases significantly by 71.2%, with a 38% improvement in ductility ratio and a 61.5% reduction in bending stress, reflecting more uniform stress distribution. Single-skin panels exhibit brittle stringer failure, whereas double-skin panels demonstrate progressive failure governed by interfacial slip and delamination. These findings highlight the effectiveness of double-skin SSP in enhancing ductility and post-elastic performance.