Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi)
Romaida Hutabarat, Rugun
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Revisiting the Compensation Submission Framework for Terrorism Victims: An Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 103/PUU-XXI/2023 Wijanarko, Dimas; Romaida Hutabarat, Rugun
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 16 No 1 (2024): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.9968

Abstract

In the submission of compensation for victims of terrorism, there should be a legal framework that provides justice and comprehensive protection for victims without administrative barriers or time limitations for claim submissions. In reality, terrorism victims often face difficulties in accessing compensation due to convoluted procedures and legal uncertainties, particularly related to the time limit for submission. This research aims to analyze the legal framework for compensation submission for terrorism victims based on Constitutional Court Decision No. 103/PUU-XXI/2023 and the changes in compensation procedures following the decision. This article uses a library research method with a qualitative approach, analyzing legal documents and relevant literature to describe and explain the legal dynamics in compensation for terrorism victims. Constitutional Court Decision No. 103/PUU-XXI/2023 brings significant changes by removing the time limit for compensation submission, providing broader opportunities for victims. However, challenges in implementing this decision still exist, particularly regarding administrative barriers and the lack of awareness and information for victims.
Pertangungjawaban Pidana Pengidap Bipolar Disorder dalam Menghapus Unsur Kesalahan Pidana Jelita Katili, Julastrid; Romaida Hutabarat, Rugun
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 12 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/japendi.v5i12.7023

Abstract

Pertanggungjawaban pidana merupakan aspek penting dalam sistem hukum untuk menentukan apakah seorang pelaku dapat dikenakan sanksi atas tindakannya. Namun, kasus yang melibatkan pelaku dengan gangguan mental seperti bipolar disorder menimbulkan tantangan tersendiri, terutama terkait pemenuhan unsur kesalahan dan niat jahat. Bipolar disorder, yang ditandai dengan perubahan suasana hati ekstrem, dapat memengaruhi kemampuan seseorang untuk memahami atau mengendalikan tindakannya. Penelitian ini membahas penerapan asas Geen Straf Zonder Schuld (tidak ada pidana tanpa kesalahan) pada pengidap bipolar disorder dalam konteks hukum pidana Indonesia, dengan menyoroti Pasal 44 KUHP sebagai dasar pengecualian pidana. Perbandingan dengan sistem hukum di Amerika Serikat dan Inggris menunjukkan bahwa kedua negara tersebut memiliki pendekatan yang lebih humanis dan rehabilitatif, termasuk pengadilan khusus dan mekanisme rehabilitasi berbasis komunitas.
Pembuktian Noodweer Excess pada Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan dalam Studi Putusan Nomor 272/PID/2020/PT PDG Nur Azahra, Sakila; Romaida Hutabarat, Rugun
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1446

Abstract

Forced defense that goes beyond its limits is included in one of the reasons for abolition of a sentence because it protects oneself, honor and property accompanied by extreme mental shock based on reasons of forgiveness as explained in Article 49 paragraph (2) as happened in Decision Number 272 /PID/2020/PT PDG. The aim is to analyze how to prove noodweer excess in the crime of murder in the study of decision number 272/pid/2020/pt pdg. This writing uses normative or doctrinal legal research, because it uses information sources of norms. As experienced by the defendant Efendi Putra (Decision Number 272/PID/2020/PT PDG) carrying out a defense against himself due to a threat of crime carried out by Adek Firdaus, which Adek Firdaus carried out in the form of throwing a machete which he had hidden in the jacket he was wearing. suddenly so that the defendant carried out self-defense which unexpectedly crossed the line due to extreme mental shock which is a reason for expunging the crime within the excuse of forgiveness (Article 49 paragraph (2))
Analisis Yuridis Penentuan Kriteria Daluwarsa Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 118/PUU-XX/2022 Belana, Loudy; Romaida Hutabarat, Rugun
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1481

Abstract

There are several factors that influence the removal of the right to prosecute, one of which is due to expiration. The complainant or victim believes that the act of abolishing prosecution, especially due to expiration, means releasing the suspect from criminal responsibility, the abolition of prosecution, especially due to expiration, may not provide justice for them. This writing uses normative or doctrinal legal research because it uses information sources of norms with prescriptive research specifications. This research method includes document review or literature review, and the writing approach used is the statutory approach and the case approach. Public perception and trust in the current legal system can be harmed by the elimination of expired prosecutions. As in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 118/PUU-XX/2022, this is because the Criminal Code, especially Article 79 Paragraph (1), does not provide legal certainty to victims of criminal acts if the calculation begins after the counterfeit goods are used.
Co-Authors Belana, Loudy Jelita Katili, Julastrid Nur Azahra, Sakila Wijanarko, Dimas