Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

STUDI KOMPARASI KONSEP CINTA DALAM PANDANGAN ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER DAN SØREN AABYE KIERKEGAARD (Studi Reflektif terhadap Fenomena Bunuh Diri Atas Dasar Cinta) Zhafira, Annisa Ranah; Siswadi, Gede Agus
Jawa Dwipa Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jawa Dwipa
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbit Sekolah Tinggi Hindu Dharma Klaten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to examine and compare the concept of love in the views of two great philosophers, Arthur Schopenhauer and Søren Aabye Kierkegaard, and relate it to the phenomenon of suicide caused by love. Love is often perceived as something beautiful because it involves deep feelings of affection, emotional closeness, and genuine attachment between individuals. Love is also described as a source of happiness, inspiration, and meaning in life. It brings people together, creates warmth, and provides invaluable emotional and moral support. Love also encourages individuals to act selflessly, sacrifice for the good of others, and grow into a better person. This research uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach and text analysis. The results of this study show that Schopenhauer, with his pessimistic view, sees love as a manifestation of the irrational and selfish will to live, which often leads to suffering. Romantic love is an illusion created by the will to preserve the species, so disappointment in love can be very destructive, leading to feelings of despair and acts of suicide. In contrast, Kierkegaard, with his existentialist and religious approach, views love as an expression of subjectivity and individual decision that involves commitment and sacrifice. True love requires a leap of faith and a courageous decision, where failure in love can reflect a deep existential crisis.
Childfree Is Not A Disgrace For Women: Harmonizing the Stoicism-Mubadalah Paradigm in Fighting Stigma and Gender Discrimination Maliki, Ibnu Akbar; Zhafira, Annisa Ranah
JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Special Issue: International Conference on: "Inclusive Legal Futures: Islamic P
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jils.v9i2.17813

Abstract

Women's decision not to have children (childfree) is always labeled as an act that violates social norms. This is further exacerbated by patriarchal religious interpretations that limit women's roles to the domestic sphere. This social construct often leads to discrimination against childfree women and ignores their right to determine their own happiness in life. This article analyzes the childfree choice as a manifestation of women's pursuit of happiness and autonomy through the lens of Stoic philosophy and the Mubadalah paradigm of reciprocity. This descriptive qualitative study uses literature review with primary data from the book “Qira'ah Mubadalah” by Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir and “Filosofi Teras” by Henri Manampiring, as well as secondary data from various relevant literature. Data was collected through documentation techniques and analyzed using content analysis. The results of the study show that Stoicism and Mubadalah create a strong paradigm to counter stigma and gender discrimination against childfree women. Despite originating from different traditions, both offer significant support for childfree women. Stoicism empowers individuals to find happiness from within, through control over thoughts and internal responses to external pressures, including social stigma. On the other hand, Mubadalah provides a strong theological foundation for deconstructing patriarchal narratives in religious interpretations that limit women's roles to reproductive functions. Both approaches emphasize individual freedom in determining one's life path, focusing on internal quality of life, and recognizing happiness as a dynamic process. Ultimately, this study affirms that discrimination against childfree women is an act that is inconsistent with human values and inclusive religious teachings, and therefore needs to be addressed with a more just and equitable understanding
PERKEMBANGAN MORAL SANTRI DALAM PENDIDIKAN PESANTREN PERSPEKTIF JOHN DEWEY Zhafira, Annisa Ranah; Attaftazani, Muhammad Ikhsan
Ta'allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol 10 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan (FTIK) UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/taalum.2022.10.2.276-289

Abstract

Pesantren merupakan wadah bagi seorang anak untuk belajar tidak hanya ilmu agama tetapi juga sebagai pembentukan karakter. Tujuan penelitian mengenai perkembangan moral pesantren ini adalah untuk mengetahui bahwa anak yang baru memasuki dunia pesantren masih perlu beradaptasi dengan lingkungan dan moral seseorang belum langsung bertumbuh dengan baik. Dengan kata lain, yakni secara teoritis penelitian ini bertujuan untuk dapat menambah khazanah keilmuan perkembangan pendidikan moral di pesantren yang dilihat dari kacamata teori seorang tokoh filsafat. Sedangkan secara praktis, orang tua atau tenaga pendidik bisa mengetahui bahwa ada yang namanya tahap perkembangan moral. Oleh karena itu tenaga pendidik dan orang tua diharapkan lebih bersabar dalam menumbuhkan perkembangan moral anak. Adapun metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu metode deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan dari berbagai sumber-sumber terdahulu. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perkembangan moral pada seseorang ketika baru menempuh pendidikan di pesantren itu bertahap, karena mereka perlu beradaptasi pada lingkungan sekitarnya. Hal ini sejalan dengan teori perkembangan moral yang dikemukakan oleh John Dewey, yakni pra-moral, konvensional dan otonom.