Indiraphasa, Nuriel Shiami
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Critical Discourse Analysis on Prabowo Subianto’s Presidential Inauguration Speech Mukminin, Muhamad Saiful; Alya, Nanda Nursa; Indiraphasa, Nuriel Shiami; Wulandari, Ni Wayan Novi; Prasetya, Kabul
Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching Vol 6, No 2 (2024): August - November 2024
Publisher : Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35529/jllte.v6i2.31-47

Abstract

This study examines Prabowo Subianto's presidential inauguration speech using Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to explore how language shapes and is influenced by power and ideology in the context of Indonesian politics. A qualitative approach with a descriptive method is employed to provide a deep, comprehensive analysis of the speech text, without altering its original meaning. The data for this study is the text of Prabowo Subianto’s inauguration speech, sourced from official transcripts or recordings. Data collection involves observation and documentation, while data analysis utilizes the three CDA dimensions, i.e. textual analysis, discourse practice, and social practice. The findings reveal that the speech is structured to emphasize gratitude, a national vision, and a call for unity, using inclusive language and repetition to foster a sense of national responsibility. The discourse analysis shows that Prabowo’s speech aims to build a positive, inclusive image and reach a broad audience through media distribution. Socially, the speech positions Indonesia as a strong, independent nation, with Prabowo portraying himself as a leader committed to democratic values and national unity. The study concludes that the speech effectively constructs a political identity based on inclusivity, responsibility, and unity.
ECOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE INDONESIAN RELIGIOUS LEADER’S SPEECH Indiraphasa, Nuriel Shiami; Firmonasari, Afrillia
CALL Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): CALL
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/call.v8i1.53674

Abstract

This study examines how environmental responsibility is discursively constructed in Alissa Qotrunnada Wahid’s speech by situating it within broader debates on religion, language, and the global climate crisis. The research aims to identify the ideological orientation of the speech and to evaluate its ecological implications through critical discourse analysis. Employing Fairclough’s (2003) three-dimensional model, textual analysis, discursive practice, and social practice, this study is complemented by Halliday’s transitivity system as well as the ecolinguistics and ecosophy framework developed by Stibbe (2021). The findings reveal that, at the textual level, the speech is dominated by material, relational, and mental processes, which collectively construct environmental protection as concrete, urgent, and morally grounded collective action rather than a purely abstract or normative appeal. The inclusive pronoun “we” positions religious institutions and communities as active agents of change, while relational processes establish environmental protection as an essential ethical and spiritual value. At the level of discursive practice, the speech is produced and legitimized through the symbolic authority of major religious organizations, particularly Nahdlatul Ulama and the GUSDURian Network, and disseminated through both formal education and grassroots community-based initiatives, including interfaith and family-centered programs. In the dimension of social practice, the discourse reflects and responds to Indonesia’s ecological challenges and advances religious ideology that frames nature as a moral trust integral to religious teachings. From an ecolinguistic perspective, the analysis concludes that the speech predominantly constitutes a beneficial discourse. It affirms values of sustainability, rejects exploitative representations of nature, and actively promotes the transformation of awareness and collective social practice toward ecological responsibility.