Yaumi Sa'adah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

New Waqf Paradigm: Integration of Islamic Commercial Finance and Islamic Social Finance Syamsuri; Penta Syahifah Dena; Yaumi Sa'adah; Fuadah Binti Johari
IQTISHADIA Jurnal Ekonomi & Perbankan Syariah Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/iqtishadia.v11i1.10758

Abstract

This paper discusses critiques of Indonesia's commercially-based waqf management and recommends solutions to improve waqf management to be more in line with Islamic principles and provide broader benefits to society. Criticism of commercial waqf management which includes waqf funds, lack of transparency and non-compliance with sharia principles. This paper underscores the importance of changing the paradigm of waqf management to integrate Islamic Social Finance (ISF) and Islamic Commercial Finance (ICF) to achieve Islamic economic goals that include social benefits and general welfare. By using normative types of research and conceptual approaches. This integration is expected to create a more inclusive and stable financial system and help overcome social and economic problems in Indonesia. In addition, this paper also discusses the basic principles in waqf management and the important role of waqf in the development of Islamic society. Through the implementation of productive commercial-based waqf, it is expected to improve the overall welfare of Muslims and make a positive contribution to sustainable development in Indonesia. Keywords: Waqf Management, Integration of Islamic Commercial Finance, Islamic Social Financial, Waqf Social-Productive Model.
STUDI PERBANDINGAN KONSEP NEGARA YANG IDEAL MENURUT IBNU RUSYD DAN AL-FARABI Amirullah, Muhammad Azrul; Saipul Nasution; Fazari Zul Hasmi Kanggas; Yaumi Sa'adah
YUSTISI Vol 13 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v13i1.20936

Abstract

In this article, we as authors would like to discuss a comparative study of the concept of an ideal state according to Ibn Rushd and Al-Farabi, both of whom were Muslim scholars who lived in the Middle Ages, a period when Islam flourished with knowledge ranging from politics, law, philosophy, medicine, architecture, and so on. The purpose of this study is to identify the differences in their formulations regarding how a state can become the best possible framework, whose implementation has a significant impact on the lives of its people. The research method employed in this study is library research. In his previous explanation, Ibn Rushd emphasised three concepts, namely the ideal state, which is the sovereignty of the people (al-siyadah), freedom (al-hurriyah), equality (al-musawah), and diversity (pluralism). These concepts form the basis for a just and prosperous state according to his thinking. Meanwhile, Al-Farabi's concept of the ideal state, called al-Madinah al-Fadhilah, is a state that aims to achieve worldly and eternal happiness for all its citizens. This state is led by a wise philosopher-king who has extensive knowledge and is able to lead society towards moral and spiritual perfection. By introducing the concept of Philosopher-Prophet Leadership (scholars), Happiness, Structured Society, Justice and Prosperity, a Just Economic System, Education and Morality.
STUDI PERBANDINGAN KONSEP NEGARA YANG IDEAL MENURUT IBNU RUSYD DAN AL-FARABI Amirullah, Muhammad Azrul; Saipul Nasution; Fazari Zul Hasmi Kanggas; Yaumi Sa'adah
YUSTISI Vol 13 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v13i1.20936

Abstract

In this article, we as authors would like to discuss a comparative study of the concept of an ideal state according to Ibn Rushd and Al-Farabi, both of whom were Muslim scholars who lived in the Middle Ages, a period when Islam flourished with knowledge ranging from politics, law, philosophy, medicine, architecture, and so on. The purpose of this study is to identify the differences in their formulations regarding how a state can become the best possible framework, whose implementation has a significant impact on the lives of its people. The research method employed in this study is library research. In his previous explanation, Ibn Rushd emphasised three concepts, namely the ideal state, which is the sovereignty of the people (al-siyadah), freedom (al-hurriyah), equality (al-musawah), and diversity (pluralism). These concepts form the basis for a just and prosperous state according to his thinking. Meanwhile, Al-Farabi's concept of the ideal state, called al-Madinah al-Fadhilah, is a state that aims to achieve worldly and eternal happiness for all its citizens. This state is led by a wise philosopher-king who has extensive knowledge and is able to lead society towards moral and spiritual perfection. By introducing the concept of Philosopher-Prophet Leadership (scholars), Happiness, Structured Society, Justice and Prosperity, a Just Economic System, Education and Morality.