Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum AS-SIYASI JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Mimbar Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities
Kolang, Al Rhega Caesar Grestiano
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Prinsip Utilitarian(-isme) Jeremy Bentham dan Keterlibatannya terhadap Perkembangan Positivisme Hukum Klasik Kolang, Al Rhega Caesar Grestiano
MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Morality : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52947/morality.v10i2.578

Abstract

Penelitian ini mencoba untuk menjelaskan pemikiran Jeremy Bentham tentang utilitarianisme sebagai sebuah paham filosofis dalam diskursus ilmu hukum (jurisprudence), serta melihat keterlibatannya terhadap perkembangan tradisi dominan dalam ilmu hukum (jurisprudence), yakni positivisme hukum (klasik). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal dengan pendekatan konseptual (teoritis). Bahan hukum akan diasalkan dari sumber-sumber normatif yang relevan dengan permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini guna mengungkap pemikiran Jeremy Bentham. Sosok Bentham tumbuh dalam tradisi hukum Anglo-Saxon (common law), yang mana pada waktu itu tradisi empirisme cukup kuat berakar di Inggris. Melalui tradisi epistemik yang berkembang sewaktu itu, Bentham melakukan kritik radikal terhadap sistem hukum –common law– di Inggris yang dianggapnya cukup menyesatkan masyarakat Inggris. Bentham mencoba melakukan reformasi terhadap ilmu hukum (jurisprudence) dan sistem hukum –common law– Inggris yang didasarkan oleh paradigma hukum alam (natural law). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan prinsip utilitarianismenya Bentham berusaha memberikan fondasi yang kokoh terhadap pembentukan hukum yang adil dan dapat menjadi tolok ukur yang pasti bagi sistem hukum Inggris melalui hukum positif. Pemikiran Bentham pun sekaligus menandai kemunculan tradisi positivisme hukum sebagai tradisi dominan dalam ilmu hukum (jurisprudence) modern
Normative Reposition of Regional Head Regulations in the Indonesian Legal System Kolang, Al Rhega Caesar Grestiano
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v5i1.26341

Abstract

Regional head regulations as regional government implementers based on the principle of regional autonomy are posited in two aspects: statutory regulations and policy rules. This sometimes leads to forming regional head regulations in the name of beleid (kebijakan) without any normative foundations. Furthermore, the implications of these two positions are theoretically important in the discourse of administrative law [studies]. Based on this matter, this paper aims to examine the position of regional head regulations in its dual position and then decide its normative [re]position in the Indonesian legal system. For this reason, the research questions in this paper are: What is the normativity of regional head regulations among their position as statutory regulations or policy rules in the Indonesian legal system? The research method used in this paper is doctrinal legal research with a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. Based on the research results, this paper argues that regional head regulations are statutory regulations and no longer have a duality of position, especially as material policy rules. Therefore, this paper concludes that every creation of regional head regulations must be based on the provisions of attribution and delegation as well as being the object of juridical control in the form of judicial review and executive review.
Political Party as Legal Subject after National Criminal Code Kolang, Al Rhega Caesar Grestiano; Sukki, A. Tenri; Akram, Muhammad Dinul
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2246

Abstract

This study seeks to broaden the legal definition of corporations to encompass political parties as entities subject to criminal law. By expanding how we understand corporations in criminal contexts, the research explores whether political parties can be treated as corporate entities that bear criminal responsibility and face prosecution. The proposed criminal penalties for political parties would mirror those applied to corporations under the National Criminal Code, with one notable exception: the potential for dissolution. However, the authority to dissolve political parties remains solely with the Constitutional Court under the 1945 Constitution. The article addresses two primary questions: how political parties should be classified within criminal law frameworks, and what forms of criminal accountability and sentencing should apply to political parties under the new National Criminal Code.
Problematika Teoretis–Doktriner Hak Gugat Perdata Oleh Pemerintah Dalam Undang-Undang Tentang Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Kolang, Al Rhega Caesar Grestiano; Librayanto, Romi; Mas Bakar, Dian Utami; Yunus, Ahsan
Mimbar Hukum Vol 37 No 2 (2025): Mimbar Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/mh.v37i2.23228

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to examine the position of the Government’s Right to Bring a Civil Lawsuit in the PPLH Law from a theoretical–doctrinal perspective. Accordingly, the research question in this paper is whether, by virtue of its position as the government, it can be theoretically and doctrinally justified [to be granted the right and/or to have the right] to file a civil lawsuit for tortious acts as regulated in Article 90 paragraph (1) PPLH Law (UU PPLH), especially on the grounds of public interest? This paper begins its discussion by analyzing the historical dimension of the civil law tradition rooted in Roman law to identify a clear division (summa divisio) between public law and private law. The analysis then continues to examine the theoretical–doctrinal debates and their implications for the government’s position in utilizing civil law along with its claims to civil rights, which simultaneously reveals the problems arising from the regulation in Article 90 paragraph (1) of the PPLH Law (UU PPLH), namely the mixing of these two legal regimes. Therefore, this paper argues for the necessity of reforming the UU PPLH to prevent the conflation of laws and to reestablish public law as the authentic legal framework for every governmental legal action. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kedudukan Hak Pemerintah untuk Mengajukan Gugatan Perdata dalam UU PPLH dari perspektif teoretis–doktrinal. Pertanyaan penelitian dalam tulisan ini adalah, apakah berdasarkan posisinya sebagai pemerintah, dapat dibenarkan secara teoretis–doktriner [untuk diberikan hak dan/atau memiliki hak] untuk mengajukan gugatan PMH (tort) secara perdata sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 90 ayat (1) Undang-Undang PPLH (UU PPLH), khususnya atas dasar kepentingan umum? Tulisan ini memulai pembahasannya dengan menganalisis dimensi historis tradisi hukum sipil yang berakar pada hukum Romawi untuk mengidentifikasi pembagian yang tegas (summa divisio) antara hukum publik dan hukum privat (perdata). Analisis kemudian dilanjutkan dengan meneliti perdebatan teoretis–doktrinal serta implikasinya terhadap kedudukan pemerintah dalam menggunakan hukum perdata beserta klaimnya atas hak-hak perdata, yang secara bersamaan mengungkap masalah yang timbul dari ketentuan Pasal 90 ayat (1) UU PPLH, yakni terjadinya pencampuradukan dua rezim hukum tersebut. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini berargumen bahwa reform[ul]asi UU PPLH diperlukan untuk mencegah terjadinya pencampuradukan dua rezim hukum dan mengembalikan hukum publik sebagai kerangka hukum yang autentik bagi setiap tindakan hukum pemerintah.
Co-Authors Akram, Muhammad Dinul Dian Utami Mas Bakar, Dian Utami Romi Librayanto, Romi Sukki, A. Tenri Yunus, Ahsan