Waluyadi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Cirebon Regional Government Policy To Protect Child Victims Of Sexual Violence Waluyadi; Marlina, Tina; Gumilang, Iwan G.; Irwany Indriyanti, Diah; Yuniarsih Genuni, Rianda
Arena Hukum Vol. 17 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2024.01701.6

Abstract

This paper examines victims from the standpoint of criminal law, as well as the Cirebon Regency government’s policy and implementation for protecting child victims of sexual violence based on a sociolegal method supported by primary and secondary data. Data collection is based on literature studies, documentary studies, and interviews. Research data were analysed based on a qualitative method. The findings of the study reveal that victim protection in criminal law is indirect. The Cirebon Regency government established regional regulations, regent regulations, and regent instructions to protect child victims of sexual violence. A non-governmental organisation in the Cirebon Regency shows concern about child victim protection since the protection of child victims of sexual violence in the Cirebon Regency has not been appropriately implemented.
Failure Of Diversion And Fulfillment Of The Best Interests Of Children In Conflict With The Law Waluyadi; Muslikhah; Mariana, Montisa
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.5972

Abstract

This study critically examines the failure of diversion programs in fulfilling the best interests of children in conflict with the law. Diversion, which aims to redirect juvenile offenders from the formal justice system toward rehabilitation, has been a key principle in juvenile justice systems. However, its failure to achieve effective outcomes—particularly in safeguarding children’s rights and welfare—remains a pressing concern. This research aims to identify the factors contributing to the failure of diversion, associating these with the broader endeavor to protect and promote the best interests of children. The study reveals several factors leading to the failure of diversion: the lack of consensus between victims and offenders or their families, the non-implementation of agreements, and differing interpretations of key legal provisions under Article 3 of Perma No. 4 of 2014 and Article 7 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law (SPPA). These factors have contributed to inconsistencies in the application of diversion measures. Despite these failures, the study finds that the law still offers avenues for protecting the best interests of children, particularly when diversion is successful. Achieving effective diversion can lead to faster, simpler, and lower-case examinations, promoting rehabilitation and reintegration over punishment. The study contributes to the national and global discourse on juvenile justice by highlighting the challenges of implementing diversion programs and offering insights for reform.