Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.006
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal (INS9MJ) Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights
Ahmad Muharrom
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis Of Dispute Resolution With Arbitration Measures Based On Law N0. 30 Year 1999 Ahmad Muharrom; David Kurniawan; Dede Kurniawan
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Vol 1. No 1 Mei 2024 : JCISNU
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.236

Abstract

Dispute resolution through litigation often faces various obstacles, such as lengthy processes, relatively large costs, and lack of flexibility in meeting the needs of the parties. Therefore, arbitration is one of the alternative dispute resolution options that provides a more effective mechanism based on the principle of freedom of the parties. This study aims to analyze the position of arbitration and the stages of dispute resolution based on Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. The research method used is normative juridical research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Research data was obtained through literature studies of legal regulations, literature, and doctrines related to arbitration and dispute resolution. The results of the study show that arbitration is a mechanism for resolving civil disputes outside the court which has special characteristics in the form of a process that is private, flexible, involves arbitrators who have certain expertise, and produces final and binding judgments. Based on Law No. 30 of 1999, dispute resolution is carried out through several stages, namely peace efforts between the parties, the assistance of mediators or expert advisors, and if no agreement is reached, it can be continued through arbitration institutions or ad hoc arbitration. In conclusion, arbitration is an effective dispute resolution mechanism because it is able to provide legal certainty, time efficiency, and protection of the interests of the parties in resolving civil disputes, especially in the field of trade.  
Analysis Of Dispute Resolution With Arbitration Measures Based On Law N0. 30 Year 1999 Ahmad Muharrom; David kurniawan; Dede Kurniawan; Mhd anggi Hermawan; Reza Sahputra Panyalai
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): SEPTEMBER 2024 :ISNU Nine-Star_INS9MJ
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v1i2.108

Abstract

Dispute resolution is one of the important aspects in various legal relationships, whether in the field of business, contracts, or personal relationships. Law No. 30/1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution provides a clear legal framework for resolving disputes through arbitration. Arbitration offers various advantages such as a fast and cost-effective process, binding results, so that it is increasingly in demand as an alternative to dispute resolution compared to litigation in court. This analysis aims to explore and explain the steps of dispute resolution through arbitration starting from the submission of a request for arbitration, the appointment of arbitrators, to the enforcement of arbitral awards. By understanding these steps, it is expected that the parties involved in the dispute can make a better decision on the appropriate settlement method.
Analysis Of Dispute Resolution With Arbitration Measures Based On Law N0. 30 Year 1999 Ahmad Muharrom; David Kurniawan; Dede Kurniawan
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Vol 1. No 1 Mei 2024 : JCISNU
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.236

Abstract

Dispute resolution through litigation often faces various obstacles, such as lengthy processes, relatively large costs, and lack of flexibility in meeting the needs of the parties. Therefore, arbitration is one of the alternative dispute resolution options that provides a more effective mechanism based on the principle of freedom of the parties. This study aims to analyze the position of arbitration and the stages of dispute resolution based on Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. The research method used is normative juridical research with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Research data was obtained through literature studies of legal regulations, literature, and doctrines related to arbitration and dispute resolution. The results of the study show that arbitration is a mechanism for resolving civil disputes outside the court which has special characteristics in the form of a process that is private, flexible, involves arbitrators who have certain expertise, and produces final and binding judgments. Based on Law No. 30 of 1999, dispute resolution is carried out through several stages, namely peace efforts between the parties, the assistance of mediators or expert advisors, and if no agreement is reached, it can be continued through arbitration institutions or ad hoc arbitration. In conclusion, arbitration is an effective dispute resolution mechanism because it is able to provide legal certainty, time efficiency, and protection of the interests of the parties in resolving civil disputes, especially in the field of trade.  
Analisis Kendala Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yofiza Yofiza; Ahmad Muharrom; David Kurniawan; Refli Attalariq; Zulfarhan Ibrahim Harahap; Ibnu Zarir
Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights Vol 1, No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jclhr.v1i2.5380

Abstract

Tindak pidana pencucian uang telah berkembang menjadi ancaman yang signifikan bagi stabilitas ekonomi, keuangan, dan keamanan suatu negara. Penegakan hukum terhadap kejahatan ini menghadapi banyak tantangan dari segi regulasi, institusi, dan kolaborasi internasional. Metode normatif digunakan dalam penelitian ini untuk menganalisis kerangka hukum saat ini dan kendala utama yang dihadapi dalam pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan keterbatasan teknologi, kekurangan sumber daya manusia, dan ketidaksesuaian regulasi nasional dan internasional. Selain itu, penelitian ini menyarankan cara-cara untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut. Misalnya, kerangka hukum harus diperkuat, teknologi canggih harus diadopsi, dan koordinasi antarinstansi harus ditingkatkan.
Co-Authors David kurniawan Dede Kurniawan Ibnu zarir Mhd Anggi Hermawan Refli Attalariq Reza Sahputra Panyalai Soni Askar Sinaga Yofiza Yofiza Zulfarhan ibrahim harahap