Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights
Farida Maharani Nasution
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Arbitration as an Alternative to Dispute Resolution in the Indonesian Legal System Analysis of Legal Effectiveness and Certainty Sabilah Widyanti; Desti Nur Fitriah Pasaribu; Farida Maharani Nasution; Annisa Divanny Nasution; Misli Ihsana Darlian
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Vol 1. No 2 Sept 2024 : JCISNU
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.251

Abstract

The increase in the complexity of business relationships requires a dispute resolution mechanism that is able to provide legal certainty quickly, efficiently, and fairly. Dispute resolution through litigation often faces obstacles in the form of lengthy procedures, high costs, and the potential to disrupt the business relationship of the parties. In this context, arbitration is present as an alternative form of dispute resolution that has gained recognition in the Indonesian legal system through Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. This study aims to analyze the position of arbitration as an alternative solution to dispute resolution, its implementation mechanism, and the legal force of arbitration awards in ensuring legal certainty for the parties. The research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are analyzed qualitatively descriptively through deductive reasoning. The results of the study show that arbitration has advantages in the form of flexible procedures, faster dispute resolution, relatively efficient costs, confidentiality of the examination process, and freedom of the parties in choosing arbitrators who have competence in the field of dispute. In addition, final and binding arbitration awards provide legal certainty while ensuring the effectiveness of dispute resolution, although its implementation still faces challenges in the form of low utilization of arbitration and obstacles to the execution of awards in practice. Therefore, arbitration is an effective dispute resolution instrument to support a conducive business climate, increase legal certainty, and realize fast, efficient, and fair dispute resolution.
Arbitration as an Alternative to Dispute Resolution in the Indonesian Legal System Analysis of Legal Effectiveness and Certainty Sabilah Widyanti; Desti Nur Fitriah Pasaribu; Farida Maharani Nasution; Annisa Divanny Nasution; Misli Ihsana Darlian
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Vol 1. No 2 Sept 2024 : JCISNU
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.251

Abstract

The increase in the complexity of business relationships requires a dispute resolution mechanism that is able to provide legal certainty quickly, efficiently, and fairly. Dispute resolution through litigation often faces obstacles in the form of lengthy procedures, high costs, and the potential to disrupt the business relationship of the parties. In this context, arbitration is present as an alternative form of dispute resolution that has gained recognition in the Indonesian legal system through Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. This study aims to analyze the position of arbitration as an alternative solution to dispute resolution, its implementation mechanism, and the legal force of arbitration awards in ensuring legal certainty for the parties. The research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are analyzed qualitatively descriptively through deductive reasoning. The results of the study show that arbitration has advantages in the form of flexible procedures, faster dispute resolution, relatively efficient costs, confidentiality of the examination process, and freedom of the parties in choosing arbitrators who have competence in the field of dispute. In addition, final and binding arbitration awards provide legal certainty while ensuring the effectiveness of dispute resolution, although its implementation still faces challenges in the form of low utilization of arbitration and obstacles to the execution of awards in practice. Therefore, arbitration is an effective dispute resolution instrument to support a conducive business climate, increase legal certainty, and realize fast, efficient, and fair dispute resolution.
Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yofiza Yofiza; Alfania Pane; Annisa Divanny Nasution; Bima Ilman Mirazha Hasibuan; Farida Maharani Nasution
Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights Vol 1, No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jclhr.v1i2.5388

Abstract

Di zaman globalisasi dan perkembangan teknologi yang cepat, kejahatan pencucian uang menjadi ancaman serius bagi stabilitas ekonomi dan sistem keuangan di Indonesia. Pencucian uang tidak hanya merugikan negara melalui hilangnya potensi pendapatan pajak, tetapi juga merusak integritas sistem keuangan serta menciptakan peluang bagi kejahatan terorganisir. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebijakan hukum yang ada, tantangan dalam penegakan hukum, dan efektivitas dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 mengenai antisipasi serta penanganan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Penelitian ini menerapkan metode studi kasus dengan pendekatan analisis dokumen, yang mengkaji implementasi kebijakan melalui berbagai kasus nyata dan data empiris. Temuan penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa walaupun ada kerangka hukum yang jelas dan lembaga terkait yang berperan, tantangan signifikan masih menghambat penegakan hukum, termasuk kompleksitas transaksi keuangan, kurangnya koordinasi antar lembaga pemerintah, serta keterbatasan sumber daya manusia dalam menangani kasus pencucian uang. Selain itu, kurangnya kesadaran masyarakat mengenai bahaya pencucian uang juga menjadi faktor yang memperburuk situasi ini. Untuk meningkatkan efektivitas kebijakan dalam memberantas kejahatan pencucian uang, perlu ada pembaruan regulasi yang mengikuti perkembangan modus operandi para pelaku kejahatan. Selain itu, pelatihan bagi penegak hukum dan peningkatan kerja sama internasional sangat penting dalam memperkuat jaringan pencegahan dan penegakan hukum. Usulan yang diperoleh dari studi ini diharapkan mampu memperkuat integritas sistem keuangan di Indonesia dan melindungi masyarakat dari dampak negatif pencucian uang.
Co-Authors Alfania Pane Annisa Divanny Nasution Bima Ilman Mirazha Hasibuan Desti Nur Fitriah Pasaribu Hamonangna Siregar Misli Ihsana Darlian Sabilah Widyanti Yofiza Yofiza